2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2023.105394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear banding as a dissipative structure from a thermodynamic viewpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reaching complete failure with weakly interacting cracks suggests subcritical crack growth, occurring at low stress threshold (the long-term strength) and low stress transfer with a few finite-size effect in weak, eventually fractured volumes, the fracturing process as a whole being a long-term process. This case is similar to the low-m case in Figures 3a-3e of Tang andKaiser (1998) or in Figures 4.10-4.11 of Tang andHudson (2011), to the compliant layer case in Gudmundsson (2005), to the loose-sand case in geomechanics (see, e.g., Nicot et al, 2023), or to the stable mode of Lyakhovsky and Shalev (2021). The end-member case where there is no crack interaction, that is p′ = 0, corresponds to the failure at constant displacement or strain described, for example, in Turcotte et al (2003) and Gudmundsson (2012), which is possible in already fractured media; therefore n 0 is the event rate without crack interaction.…”
Section: Weak Crack Interaction Casesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reaching complete failure with weakly interacting cracks suggests subcritical crack growth, occurring at low stress threshold (the long-term strength) and low stress transfer with a few finite-size effect in weak, eventually fractured volumes, the fracturing process as a whole being a long-term process. This case is similar to the low-m case in Figures 3a-3e of Tang andKaiser (1998) or in Figures 4.10-4.11 of Tang andHudson (2011), to the compliant layer case in Gudmundsson (2005), to the loose-sand case in geomechanics (see, e.g., Nicot et al, 2023), or to the stable mode of Lyakhovsky and Shalev (2021). The end-member case where there is no crack interaction, that is p′ = 0, corresponds to the failure at constant displacement or strain described, for example, in Turcotte et al (2003) and Gudmundsson (2012), which is possible in already fractured media; therefore n 0 is the event rate without crack interaction.…”
Section: Weak Crack Interaction Casesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When p ′ tends to 1, n ( t ) and the interactions between cracks increase, which requires sufficient rock strength; the characteristic length of the stress field perturbation reaches the size of the body to be ruptured. This may be compared to the high‐m case in Figures 3a’–3e’ of Tang and Kaiser (1998) or in Figures 4.10–4.11 of Tang and Hudson (2011), to the stiff layer case in Gudmundsson (2005), to the dense‐sand case in geomechanics (see, e.g., Nicot et al., 2023), or to the runaway mode of Lyakhovsky and Shalev (2021). In the strong crack interaction case, the continuity is expressed by Equations 15 or 25, and Equation 32 writes (see, e.g., Turcotte et al., 2003 for a similar reasoning): dN(t)dt=n0eαδN(t) $\frac{dN(t)}{dt}={n}_{0}{e}^{\alpha \delta N(t)}$ which is a first‐order linear differential equation, the solution of which is: N(t)=n0tc0.25emln()1ttc $N(t)=-{n}_{0}{t}_{c}\,\mathrm{ln}\left(1-\frac{t}{{t}_{c}}\right)$ if N ( t = 0) = 0 and tc=1n0αδ ${t}_{c}=\frac{1}{{n}_{0}\alpha \delta }$.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, for a sufficiently densely packed specimen, a phase transition is observed after a certain level of shearing coinciding with the formation of a strain localization pattern with one or multiple shear bands developing (Desrues and Andò, 2015). It was recently shown that this phase transition is consistent with the extremal entropy production theorems (Nicot et al, 2023), leading to an optimal dissipative structure (namely, the shear band pattern) able to dissipate the most part of the external energy put into the system, and making the system able to sustain external loading without collapsing (Wang et al, 2023).…”
Section: Critical State Regime In the Light Of The Configurational Me...mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This assumption is reasonable in most situations but can fail when dealing with very large-scale problems such as in earthquakes where the mobilized frictional energy under very high tectonic pressures induces fast and significant temperature rises. As shown in Nicot et al (2023), the internal entropy production int S & is proportional to the plastic dissipation power…”
Section: Preamblementioning
confidence: 97%