2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.1.033605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear-coupled grain-boundary migration dependence on normal strain/stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some materials, this deformation mode is more effective at enhancing plastic deformation than more common deformation mechanisms such as pure grain boundary sliding (Molodov and Molodov 2018). However, it is also becoming clear that the character of the particular grain boundary or interface plays a significant role in determining the efficiency of shear-coupled migration, with different grain boundaries having very different shear strengths (Combe et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some materials, this deformation mode is more effective at enhancing plastic deformation than more common deformation mechanisms such as pure grain boundary sliding (Molodov and Molodov 2018). However, it is also becoming clear that the character of the particular grain boundary or interface plays a significant role in determining the efficiency of shear-coupled migration, with different grain boundaries having very different shear strengths (Combe et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, atomistic simulations of real GBs are only beginning, addressing the possible influence of defects present prior to deformation such as vacancies [78] or immobile disconnections [79]. A second reason for the current mismatch between the observed and simulated coupling factors may be the complex stress tensor acting locally on real GBs in small-grained metals whereas atomistic simulations involve perfectly defined and often homogenous stress states [80]. These two factors may explain why many more disconnections could be activated in real metals at lower stresses and coupling factors while the nucleation step and strictly imposed strain directions favor a given disconnection that may have a large coupling factor in simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disconnection is a GB defect with both a step and a dislocation character. Both experiments and simulations have evidenced the role of these disconnections during the SCGBM [15,16,17,18,13,19,8,9,20,21,22]. The coupling factor of the SCGBM is directly related to the ratio of the (norm of the) Burgers vector to the step height of the mobile disconnection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Cahn et al [3] have predicted for instance, in FCC crystals, four coupling modes in symmetric [001]-tilt GBs. While three of them have been evidenced in Molecular dynamics simulations [3,6,7,8,9], only two modes have been experimentally observed in macroscopic sheared Al bicrystals [10,11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%