1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(98)00194-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear lag in steel angles: An investigation of the South African standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T r = φA g F y (9) T r = 0.85φA ne F u (10) where T r is the factored tensile resistance; φ is the resistance factor; A g is the gross cross-sectional area and A ne is the effective net area reduced for shear lag. A rather comprehensive approach is adopted by CAN/CSA-S16-01 [4] to evaluate the effective net sectional area in order to account for the shear lag effect.…”
Section: Can/csa-s16-01 (2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T r = φA g F y (9) T r = 0.85φA ne F u (10) where T r is the factored tensile resistance; φ is the resistance factor; A g is the gross cross-sectional area and A ne is the effective net area reduced for shear lag. A rather comprehensive approach is adopted by CAN/CSA-S16-01 [4] to evaluate the effective net sectional area in order to account for the shear lag effect.…”
Section: Can/csa-s16-01 (2001)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uzoegbo [9] concluded that the shear lag effect should be evaluated individually for each leg of the angle specimen based on his test results for steel angles with welded connections. Petretta [10] tested 23 double angle specimens with welded end connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the longest weld Uzoegbo (1998). also conducted a series of tension tests on a single angle welded to the gusset plate at one leg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum net section efficiency was found to be greater than 0.9 for plates, 0.8 for angles and a maximum o f 0.9 for channels. Based on the test results, an upper net section efficiency limit for (2.22) o f 0.9 was recommended for most structural shapes Uzoegbo (1998). also conducted a series o f tension tests on a single angle welded to a gusset plate at one leg.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%