2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear modulus of colloidal suspensions: Comparing experiments with theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An increase in the volume percent of the oil leads to an increase in both the dynamic moduli and yield stress, for category 2 emulsions (see Figure 3A). This behavior is consistent with known emulsion rheological behavior, where an increased dispersed phase increases rheological properties 25–28 . Conversely, for phase‐inverted category 3 emulsions, the opposite relation is observed—both dynamic moduli and yield stress decrease with increasing oil fraction (see Figure 3B).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An increase in the volume percent of the oil leads to an increase in both the dynamic moduli and yield stress, for category 2 emulsions (see Figure 3A). This behavior is consistent with known emulsion rheological behavior, where an increased dispersed phase increases rheological properties 25–28 . Conversely, for phase‐inverted category 3 emulsions, the opposite relation is observed—both dynamic moduli and yield stress decrease with increasing oil fraction (see Figure 3B).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This behavior is consistent with known emulsion rheological behavior, where an increased dispersed phase increases rheological properties. [25][26][27][28] Conversely, for phase-inverted category 3 emulsions, the opposite relation is observed-both dynamic moduli and yield stress decrease with increasing oil fraction (see Figure 3B).…”
Section: Effect Of Formulation On Rheologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6(b). As we aim to measure the linear elastic modulus as a function of resting time in the range of [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]] minutes, we chose c ¼ 10 À4 (10 À2 %) which is in the linear domain for the three resting times. It can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Elastic Modulus Measurements Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), or others [6]. Rheology of colloidal suspension is mainly controlled by particle interactions, and a lot of work has been devoted to study the link between interactions at the particle scale and the overall behavior of the suspension [2,5,[7][8][9][10][11]. Thanks to these works, consensus has emerged to attribute the intricate overall properties of attractive colloidal particle suspensions to the changes in the particle microstructure induced by flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there are two kinds of interparticle interactions: electrical attraction between positively charged edges and negatively charged surfaces, and electrical repulsion between edges and=or surfaces of like charge. It has been confirmed that interparticle interactions are very important in controlling the colloidal behavior of the clay suspension, [12,13] and could be changed with the pH of solution, the type of electrolyte ion, surfactant, and polymer in the medium. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Among them, the added electrolyte, surfactant, or polymer could change the surface charge, the electrostatic repulsive and attractive interactions between particles, rendering interparticles extra interaction, and then influencing the flocculation state of the suspension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%