2020
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-020-1452-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear resistance analytical evaluation for RC beams with transverse reinforcement with two different inclinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Colajanni et al [22] proposed a model based on the stress field approach, able to assess the shear capacity of RC members having transverse reinforcement arranged with two different inclinations. Here, that model is modified to be applied in the case of RC beams retrofitted with FRP reinforcement inclined in any direction.…”
Section: Design-oriented Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Colajanni et al [22] proposed a model based on the stress field approach, able to assess the shear capacity of RC members having transverse reinforcement arranged with two different inclinations. Here, that model is modified to be applied in the case of RC beams retrofitted with FRP reinforcement inclined in any direction.…”
Section: Design-oriented Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model also represents the extension of a model based on the stress field approach, able to assess shear strength of retrofitted RC beams with vertically-oriented FRP reinforcement only [23]. On the basis of the same assumption of the models proposed in [22,24], shear capacity of a strengthened RC beam can be assessed by means of three different equations, obtained by calculating the vertical equilibrium of beam segments, identified via three different sections parallel to stress field directions of concrete strut, steel stirrups, and FRP reinforcement, respectively (Figure 1). By doing so, each of the three equilibrium equations, which are given below, depends only on two stress fields, and can be easily solved: A f b s f are the nondimensional stresses and the mechanical ratios of FRP reinforcement and steel stirrups, respectively, ffu is the nominal rupture stress of the fiber, R the strain and stress "effective" coefficient (effective strain fe= fu R, effective stress ffe=ffu R=Ef fe), and r is the reduction factor of the efficiency of the steel stirrups.…”
Section: Design-oriented Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear failure in RC members is one of the most critical and undesired failure phenomena. Beams and columns of existing RC Moment Resisting Frames (MRFs) usually do not satisfy the current code requirements regarding shear strength; thus, often it becomes necessary to strengthen the existing RC structural member in order to protect it from unwanted shear failure [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrofitting of existing RC frame structures by strengthening members such as beams and columns is among the commonly adopted strategies to improve the seismic capacity of existing buildings subjected to seismic actions [1][2][3]. Different approaches are available nowadays and each method provides different capacity improvement depending on the mechanical behavior of the confining device [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrofitting of existing RC frame structures by strengthening members such as beams and columns is among the commonly adopted strategies to improve the seismic capacity of existing buildings subjected to seismic actions [1][2][3]. Different approaches are available nowadays and each method provides different capacity improvement depending on the mechanical behavior of the confining device [3]. For example, Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) sheets provide to the columns passive confining mechanism [4][5][6][7][8][9], and steel jackets provide semiactive or active confinement [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%