DOI: 10.14711/thesis-b914043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear strength and seismic performance of non-seismically designed reinforced concrete beam-column joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A so-called Modified Rotating-Angle Softened-Truss Model was proposed by Wong [24] to predict the shear strength of exterior joints. The model was based on the compatibility equation proposed by modifying (i) modified compression field theory, (ii) rotating-angle softened truss-model, and (iii) fixed-angle softened truss model.…”
Section: Critical Review Of Existing Shear Strength Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A so-called Modified Rotating-Angle Softened-Truss Model was proposed by Wong [24] to predict the shear strength of exterior joints. The model was based on the compatibility equation proposed by modifying (i) modified compression field theory, (ii) rotating-angle softened truss-model, and (iii) fixed-angle softened truss model.…”
Section: Critical Review Of Existing Shear Strength Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Page 16 of 20 Al-Osta et al Int J Concr Struct Mater (2018) 12:46 To evaluate an effect of aspect ratio on shear strength of BCJ experimental results of Wong (2005), Antonopoulos and Triantafillou (2003), Pantelides et al (2008) were investigated to cover a range of aspect ratio from 1 to 2. Those experimental results have been considered in which axial load ratio was almost similar.…”
Section: Development Of Shear Strength Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse information is present in literature regarding the effect of column axial load in predicting seismic performance of BCJ. Research work by Pantelides et al (2002), Barnes and Jigoral (2008), Wong (2005), Antonopoulos and Triantafillou (2003), Pantelides et al (2008) and Sarsam and Phillips (1985) concluded that an increase in the column axial load also improves the shear capacity of BCJ. However, the range of column axial load/axial strength ratio considered by above researchers is very narrow and it is usually less than 0.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Still, nominal joint shear strengths proposed in current code provisions are only applicable to joints Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_252-1 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2021 satisfying the minimum requirements of transverse reinforcement in the joint region. Some analytical models (Vollum 1998;Hwang and Lee 1999;Lowes and Altoontash 2003;Wong 2005) for predicting joint shear strength have been developed based on the strut-and-tie (SAT) idealization incorporating Mohr's strain compatibility and softening concrete behavior, e.g., the modified compression field theory (MCFT) proposed by Vecchio and Collins (1986). However, LaFave and Shin (2005) indicated that the strength prediction using the MCFT tends to underestimate the shear strength of lightly reinforced and that of unreinforced joints.…”
Section: Loss Of Vertical Carrying Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%