2015
DOI: 10.2749/222137815818358385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear strength evaluation of RC bridge deck slabs according to CSCT with multi – layered shell elements and PARC-CL Crack Model

Abstract: Type of publication:Peer reviewed conference paper AbstractThe shear resistance of RC slabs without shear reinforcement subjected to concentrated loads near linear support is usually calibrated on the base of tests on one -way slabs with rectangular cross section. However, the actual behavior of slabs subjected to concentrated loads is described properly by a two-way slab response. The aim of this paper consists in the evaluation of the shear resistance of bridge deck slabs using analytical formulations and N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculation methods from the fib Model Code 2010 have been applied for the shear strength evaluation of bridge deck slabs . Other authors propose updating finite element models with measurements .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculation methods from the fib Model Code 2010 have been applied for the shear strength evaluation of bridge deck slabs . Other authors propose updating finite element models with measurements .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28] The calculation methods from the fib Model Code 2010 6 have been applied for the shear strength evaluation of bridge deck slabs. 29 Other authors propose updating finite element models with measurements. 30 In rare cases, load testing of a structure is necessary to evaluate its capacity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high quality of the model indicates quite low CoV = 0.099. Nevertheless, the assumption of an averaged shear force v avg,4d should be analysed very carefully, as stated by Belletti et al (2015), since it may be not suitable for various cases where boundary and loading conditions could influence the distribution of shear stresses. Furthermore, if the model is going to be used for daily design, the safety level should be increased by an update of the failure criterion in the one-way shear CSCT model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following CSCT failure criterion has been proposed for LFEM (Natário et al, 2014;Belletti, Scolari, Muttoni, & Cantone, 2015):…”
Section: Critical Shear Crack Theory (Csct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective shear width beff is calculated by dividing the total shear force going through the evaluated direction along the slab width (Vcontrol) by an averaged unitary shear force over the control sections vavg (BELLETTI et al, 2015; NATÁRIO; FERNÁNDEZ RUIZ; MUTTONI, 2014) determined with the finite element model (Eq. (5.5)).…”
Section: Refined Approach For One-way Shear Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%