2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2000)4:2(56)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear Strengthening of RCT-Joints Using CFRP Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A more rigorous model, based on stress equilibrium and strain compatibility equations of the panel zone region (idealized as a three-dimensional element) has been presented by Antonopoulos & Triantafillou (2002) as an extension of the model for RC joint behavior without FRP proposed by Pantazopoulou & Bonacci (1992). Satisfactory validation of the analytical model was obtained on the experimental results on a total of 15 beam-column exterior beam-column subassemblies, tested by the authors (Antonopoulos & Triantafillou, 2003) or available in literature (Gergely et al, 2000).…”
Section: Shear Frp Retrofit Of Jointmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more rigorous model, based on stress equilibrium and strain compatibility equations of the panel zone region (idealized as a three-dimensional element) has been presented by Antonopoulos & Triantafillou (2002) as an extension of the model for RC joint behavior without FRP proposed by Pantazopoulou & Bonacci (1992). Satisfactory validation of the analytical model was obtained on the experimental results on a total of 15 beam-column exterior beam-column subassemblies, tested by the authors (Antonopoulos & Triantafillou, 2003) or available in literature (Gergely et al, 2000).…”
Section: Shear Frp Retrofit Of Jointmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Typical over-simplified approaches consider the contribution of the FRP equivalent to external "stirrups" (analogy with steel transverse reinforcement). Upper limits of the maximum strain in the FRP material are used in the calculations, either corresponding to the declared ultimate tensile capacity (Gergely et al 1998) or to a constant strain values depending on the preparation of the concrete surface (Tsonos & Stylianidis, 1999;Gergely et al, 2000). A more rigorous model, based on stress equilibrium and strain compatibility equations of the panel zone region (idealized as a three-dimensional element) has been presented by Antonopoulos & Triantafillou (2002) as an extension of the model for RC joint behavior without FRP proposed by Pantazopoulou & Bonacci (1992).…”
Section: Shear Frp Retrofit Of Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several FRP-strengthening materials and layouts were considered to define the benefits provided to the seismic performance of beam-column joints (e.g., Gergely et al [8], Pantelides et al [9], Gergely et al [10], Granata and Parvin [11], Ghobarah and Said [12], Pantelides et al [13] among others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…connections referring to the joint region including the beam/s and column/s framing into the joint). Both exterior and interior connections have been tested with externally bonded FRP to enhance the connection shear capacity [1][2][3][4] or to enhance the anchorage capacity of poorly anchored longitudinal beam reinforcement. 5,6 In addition, FRP has been used to enhance both the shear strength of the connection and anchorage of the beam reinforcement 7,8 and also to relocate the formation of plastic hinging further along the beam away from the joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%