2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear-stress transfer across a crack in steel fibre-reinforced concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the shear strength strongly depends on the longitudinal reinforcement ratio [139], as a result of the larger contribution of dowel action [64,120,123,124,140,141] for larger amounts of reinforcement, 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the shear strength strongly depends on the longitudinal reinforcement ratio [139], as a result of the larger contribution of dowel action [64,120,123,124,140,141] for larger amounts of reinforcement, 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shear strength increases by 44% for the steel fiber volume fraction of 0.5% and 65% for the volume ratio of 1% [17]. e shear strength of SFRC exhibits a linear increase with the amount of steel fiber crossing the shear crack interface [18]. It can be seen that even if the content of steel fiber is the same, steel fiber still has different reinforced effect on different mechanical property.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The conclusions revealed that yield stress played an important role in fibre orientation and, hence, in shear strength) (see Figure 2-22b). As both compressive strength and fibre content increased (see Figure 2-22c), shear also improved, but the ductility due to fibres improved more in the normal and self-compacted concretes than in the high-strength concrete [134] In 2017, Soetens and Matthys [135] modified JSCE-SF6 to control the normal stresses in the crack, as seen in Figure 2-23a. Thus different horizontal load levels were applied and remained constant during the test.…”
Section: Figure 2-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, both test methodologies presented different failure aspects because one shear plane existed in one case, the second one included two shear planes. In the FIP tests conducted by Khanlou et al, (see Figure 2-26b), the friction between the specimen and supports was isolated by using rollers, while the specimen was fixed to a support table to avoid undesired rotations in the test of Boulekbache et al In this way, undesired horizontal strengths can be introduced into the test by means of friction and not measured as Soetens and Matthys [135] did. To clarify this point, more information about test measurements, and a comparison among the tests proposed in the literature, are required.…”
Section: Fip Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation