2009
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.27.1304.32448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shear wave splitting applications for fracture analysis and improved imaging: some onshore examples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an anisotropic media, shear-wave splitting occurs when an incident shear wave exhibits birefringence, resulting in two shear waves that are polarized parallel and perpendicular to the fracture strike, respectively (Crampin and Peacock, 2008). The shear wave S 1 propagates with faster speed than S 2 (Bale et al, 2009). Therefore, this anisotropy related phenomenon may be described by the difference in arrival times of shear waves originated from a single source (Simm and Bacon, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an anisotropic media, shear-wave splitting occurs when an incident shear wave exhibits birefringence, resulting in two shear waves that are polarized parallel and perpendicular to the fracture strike, respectively (Crampin and Peacock, 2008). The shear wave S 1 propagates with faster speed than S 2 (Bale et al, 2009). Therefore, this anisotropy related phenomenon may be described by the difference in arrival times of shear waves originated from a single source (Simm and Bacon, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The split S-waves propagate through the anisotropic medium, and are subsequently polarized along (fast, S1) and across (slow, S2) the vertical features, resulting in a difference between the detected arrival times and signal amplitudes (Lynn and Thomsen, 1990;Thomsen, 1999;Tsvankin et al, 2010). The time delay between S1 and S2 observed on the radial component (Figure 1B), and the amplitude nulls observed on the transverse component (Figure 1C), can be used respectively to constrain the percentage of anisotropy and therefore the spatial density, and the orientation of aligned vertical fractures exhibiting HTI anisotropy (e.g., Crampin, 1985;Bale et al, 2009). SWS analysis of active source data recorded on ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) has been successfully applied for marine slope stability assessment on the west Svalbard continental slope (Haacke and Westbrook, 2006) and for the identification of vertical fluid migration pathways within hydratebearing sediments in the Storrega slide offshore Norway (Exley et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introduction Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as a measure for characterising crack density and orientation or crystal alignment (Crampin et al, 2015;Savage et al, 2016). It has been studied throughout the Earth, ranging in depth from hydrocarbon reservoirs in the shallow crust (Crampin and Peacock , 2008;Verdon et al, 2009;Bale et al, 2009) to the core and deep mantle (Wookey and Helffrich, 2008). Seismic anisotropy is often considered to be an indicator of stress orientation in the crust, because closure of cracks due to differential stress leads to (transverse) waves polarized parallel to the cracks traveling faster than the orthogonal direction (Crampin, 1984;Savage, 1999).…”
Section: Seismic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%