1996
DOI: 10.5802/afst.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shearing hyperbolic surfaces, bending pleated surfaces and Thurston's symplectic form

Abstract: Shearing hyperbolic surfaces, bending pleated surfaces and Thurston's symplectic form Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse 6 e série, tome 5, n o 2 (1996), p. 233-297 © Université Paul Sabatier, 1996, tous droits réservés. L'accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse » (http://picard.ups-tlse.fr/~annales/) implique l'accord avec les conditions générales d'utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/legal.php). Toute uti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
367
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
367
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…bending lamination) on the boundary of the convex core. However, in the hyperbolic setting, Bonahon [30] proved that the two infinitesimal rigidity questions, concerning the induced metric and concerning the bending lamination, are equivalent. Bonahon [31] also gave a careful analysis of what happens near the "Fuchsian locus", showing that uniqueness does hold there.…”
Section: N7 Anti-de Sitter Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bending lamination) on the boundary of the convex core. However, in the hyperbolic setting, Bonahon [30] proved that the two infinitesimal rigidity questions, concerning the induced metric and concerning the bending lamination, are equivalent. Bonahon [31] also gave a careful analysis of what happens near the "Fuchsian locus", showing that uniqueness does hold there.…”
Section: N7 Anti-de Sitter Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed recall that every hyperbolic pair of pants with totally geodesic boundary is determined up to isometry by the length of its three boundary components and hence every geometric function is a function of these three parameters. In Section 5, using Thurston's shear coordinates, described by Bonahon in [3], and elementary manipulations involving the classical cross ratio -as opposed to hyperbolic trigonometry in the original proofs -we recover Mirzakhani-McShane formulae (1) and (2) for the pant gap function.…”
Section: These Relations Imply An Essential Symetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this result is a consequence of results of [Bo3]. By lemma 3.1, (f ∞ , Γ ∞ , ρ ∞ ) is an even or convex pleated surface.…”
Section: Proposition 33 (Kes Proposition 48) -There Is a Universamentioning
confidence: 66%