2016
DOI: 10.1515/pac-2015-1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shedding light on the hydrophobicity puzzle

Abstract: A general theory of hydrophobic hydration and pairwise hydrophobic interaction has been developed in the last years. The main ingredient is the recognition that: (a) cavity creation (necessary to insert a solute molecule into water) causes a solvent-excluded volume effect that leads to a loss in the translational entropy of water molecules; (b) the merging of two cavities (necessary to form the contact minimum configuration of two nonpolar molecules) causes a decrease in the solvent-excluded volume effect and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This event is accompanied by an increase in the total volume available for the translational displacement of water molecules located in the system, which is in turn associated with a large gain of configurational entropy of water. [71][72][73] This hypothesis has been validated by evaluating the total (SM), hydrophilic (SM H ), and lipophilic (SM L ) surface matching between the molecules and the DP T using the PLATINUM web server 70 (Table 1, last three columns). By definition, SM is a quantity that can be correlated to the reduction of the excluded volume upon binding between molecular partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This event is accompanied by an increase in the total volume available for the translational displacement of water molecules located in the system, which is in turn associated with a large gain of configurational entropy of water. [71][72][73] This hypothesis has been validated by evaluating the total (SM), hydrophilic (SM H ), and lipophilic (SM L ) surface matching between the molecules and the DP T using the PLATINUM web server 70 (Table 1, last three columns). By definition, SM is a quantity that can be correlated to the reduction of the excluded volume upon binding between molecular partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Instead, we approximated r cavity,CH 4 as r cavity,CH 4 = 1 / 2 r cavity,Kr + 1 / 2 r cavity,Xe , because predicted gas–water radial distribution functions indicate that the effective radius of CH 4 in our simulations is intermediate between those of Kr and Xe. The resulting values of r cavity (calculated with r O = 1.4 Å) for He, H 2 , Ne, Ar, Kr, CH 4 , and Xe are 2.790, 2.970, 2.793, 3.082, 3.212, 3.308, and 3.405 Å, respectively. For CO 2 , we calculated the probability that two randomly placed spheres of radius r cavity = 1 / 2 σ Oc–Oc + r O = 2.917 Å (where O c is a CO 2 oxygen atom) separated by the same distance as the two oxygen atoms in CO 2 (2.3 Å) would contain no atom.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it provides no new insights on the magnitude of the solvation free energy μ̅* itself. According to eq , μ̅* can be obtained from u̅ V * and s̅ V * , these two quantities reflecting contributions from solute–solvent attractive interactions, solvent reorganization, and excluded-volume effects. , Hence, to further explore why the μ̅* values characteristic of hydrophobic hydration are positive, it seems reasonable to make use of theory and simulations aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of the origin of both u̅ V * and s̅ V * values at a microscopic level.…”
Section: Conclusion and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%