2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6nj03617a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shedding light on the photophysical properties of iridium(iii) complexes with a dicyclometalated phosphate ligand via N-substitution from a theoretical viewpoint

Abstract: The geometrical structures and phosphorescence efficiency of two series of iridium(iii) complexes with wide-range color tuning have been focused on in this work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the use of nitrogen rich ligands promotes the blue‐emission and the decrease in the 3 MLCT character, resulting in a decreased value of k r , which agrees with the behavior of the proposed anionic complexes . Otherwise, it has been theoretically described that k r is inversely proportional to the splitting energy between the S 1 and T 1 states [Δ E (S 1 ‐T 1 )], and directly proportional to the transition electric dipole moment in the S 0 →S 1 transition (μ S1 ): knormalrEnormalenormalmnormali normalμnormalS12true(ΔEnormalS1normalT1true)2 where E emi is the emission energy in cm −1 . Accordingly, k r can be qualitatively characterized in terms of the values of [Δ E (S 1 ‐T 1 )] and μ S1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the use of nitrogen rich ligands promotes the blue‐emission and the decrease in the 3 MLCT character, resulting in a decreased value of k r , which agrees with the behavior of the proposed anionic complexes . Otherwise, it has been theoretically described that k r is inversely proportional to the splitting energy between the S 1 and T 1 states [Δ E (S 1 ‐T 1 )], and directly proportional to the transition electric dipole moment in the S 0 →S 1 transition (μ S1 ): knormalrEnormalenormalmnormali normalμnormalS12true(ΔEnormalS1normalT1true)2 where E emi is the emission energy in cm −1 . Accordingly, k r can be qualitatively characterized in terms of the values of [Δ E (S 1 ‐T 1 )] and μ S1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…It has been determined that a large 3 MLCT contribution in the emissive state increases the k r and quantum yield Φ p as observed in Os, Ir, and Pt complexes The % 3 MLCT for a given excited state is obtained as the sum of the single 3 MLCT contributions from each monoexcitations from i to j orbitals: %3normalMnormalLnormalCnormalT=false∑In[]|CI|ij[]|%|Mi%|Mj where C I is the configuration coefficient of each monoexcitation from i to j orbital in the excited state wavefunction, and %( M ) i and %( M ) j are the metal contributions to the occupied i and virtual j orbitals, respectively (more details in Section S7 of the Supporting Information). The 3 MLCT contribution in C1 ‐ C3 is of 22%‐30%, which decreases in systems C4 ‐ C6 by the fluorination of the ppy ligand.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some factors related to the k r are the transition electric dipole moment in the S 0 → S 1 transition (μS1) and the energy difference between S 1 and T n excited state (Δ E [ S 1 − T n ]; n = 1 or 2 depending of the complexes of this study). These parameters are important to evaluate since μS1 is directly proportional to k r , and Δ E ( S 1 − T n ) represent the efficiency of the ISC, therefore, a large μS1 and smaller Δ E ( S 1 − T n ) evidence a favored radiative deactivation . In addition, the Ir atom increases the spin‐orbital coupling (SOC) improving the intersystem crossing during the electronic transition, and the metallic contribution in the T n excited states (% 3 MLCT) can be quantified, since a large 3 MLCT percentage increases the k r .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The % 3 MLCT were calculated by a sum of the 3 MLCT contributions from each monoexcitations (according with their respective orbitals involved), considering the corresponding configuration coefficient as has been reported in literature …”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In OLEDs, researchers can control the emission color and photophysical properties of emitters by a modification of the chelating ligands [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The common approach in tuning the photophysical properties of FIrpic is to modify the chemical structures of 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl) pyridine (C ∧ N) ligands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%