1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00050-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sheet metal forming analysis of planar anisotropic materials by a modified membrane finite element method with bending effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other process parameters are: (i) blank-holder force F b = 20.0 kN and (ii) coefficient of friction µ = 0.17 [14]. Figure 2 shows the comparison of the predicted punch load variation (with punch displacement) with the experimental data [14]. There seems to be a reasonably good agreement between the two.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The other process parameters are: (i) blank-holder force F b = 20.0 kN and (ii) coefficient of friction µ = 0.17 [14]. Figure 2 shows the comparison of the predicted punch load variation (with punch displacement) with the experimental data [14]. There seems to be a reasonably good agreement between the two.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The geometric dimensions used in the circular cup drawing experiment are: blank diameter = 110 mm, blank thickness = 0.74 mm, punch diameter = 50 mm, die opening diameter = 52.5 mm, die profile radius = 8 mm, punch profile radius = 8 mm [14]. The material used is Aluminum-killed steel [14] with Young's modulus = 200 GPa, Poisson's ratio = 0.3, Yield strength ((σ y ) 0 ) = 162 MPa, Stress-strain curve: σ y = 562(0.00941 + ε pL eq ) 0.266 (stress in MPa). The other process parameters are: (i) blank-holder force F b = 20.0 kN and (ii) coefficient of friction µ = 0.17 [14].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deep drawing of a square cup, initially proposed in Numisheet'93 conference (Makinouchi et al, 1993), is considered here to further assess the performance of the SHB-EXP elements in the context of sheet metal forming processes, which involve large plastic deformations, material nonlinearity and anisotropy, and double-sided contact. Note that this benchmark test is very popular within the sheet metal forming community and, accordingly, it has been investigated by a number of authors in the literature (see, e.g., Choi and Huh, 1999;Schwarze et al, 2011;Pagani et al, 2014). The schematic view of the setup and the associated geometric dimensions are shown in The initial dimensions of the sheet are 150 mm × 150 mm × 0.81 mm.…”
Section: Deep Drawing Of a Square Cupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this, the initial blank shape can be modified to produce a final et al (1999) suggested a new blank design method combining the ideal forming theory with a deformation path iteration method involving FE analysis. Choi and Huh (1999) introduced a modified membrane finite element with proper formulation to correctly enhance the flexural rigidity not only within an element but also amongst elements. Hu et al (2001) proposed schemes for controlling the flange earring of deep drawing process of circular sheets with stronger anisotropy using a Barlat-Lian anisotropy to yield function conjunction with a quasi-flow corner theory of elastic-plastic deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%