2017
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shelf‐margin clinothem progradation, degradation and readjustment: Tanqua depocentre, Karoo Basin (South Africa)

Abstract: Degradation of basin‐margin clinothems around the shelf‐edge rollover zone may lead to the generation of conduits through which gravity flows transport sediment downslope. Many studies from seismic‐reflection data sets show these features, but they lack small‐scale (centimetre to metre) sedimentary and stratigraphic observations on process interactions. Exhumed basin‐margin clinothems in the Tanqua depocentre (Karoo Basin) provide seismic‐reflection‐scale geometries and internal details of architecture with de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(183 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ash beds potentially derived from the Choiyoi volcanic province (Northern Patagonia) are interbedded in these formations, with a higher density in the Collingham Formation (McLachlan & Jonker, ; Veevers et al ., ; Viljoen, ; McKay et al ., ). These mudstone‐rich formations are overlain by the well‐studied, sandy basin‐floor fans of the Skoorsteenberg Formation (Wickens, ; Johnson et al ., ; Hodgson et al ., ) and the upper slope to shelf deposits of the Waterford Formation (Wild et al ., ; Dixon et al ., ; Poyatos‐Moré et al ., ; Gomis‐Cartesio et al ., , ; Fig. C).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ash beds potentially derived from the Choiyoi volcanic province (Northern Patagonia) are interbedded in these formations, with a higher density in the Collingham Formation (McLachlan & Jonker, ; Veevers et al ., ; Viljoen, ; McKay et al ., ). These mudstone‐rich formations are overlain by the well‐studied, sandy basin‐floor fans of the Skoorsteenberg Formation (Wickens, ; Johnson et al ., ; Hodgson et al ., ) and the upper slope to shelf deposits of the Waterford Formation (Wild et al ., ; Dixon et al ., ; Poyatos‐Moré et al ., ; Gomis‐Cartesio et al ., , ; Fig. C).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The presence of incision surfaces at the base of Unit G mantled by mudstone clast conglomerates (Figure b) is consistent with several phases of erosion and sediment bypass, forming a lag deposit. The overlying fining‐ and thinning‐upward heterolithic section of sub‐unit G1 (Figure a) either represents a landward stepping of the depositional system due to transgression and increased accommodation, or the final infill of a deeper incision (see Gomis‐Cartesio, Poyatos‐Moré, Hodgson, & Flint, ). The presence of hummocky‐cross stratification in sub‐unit G2 (Figure c) indicates deposition above storm wave base and the absence of sediment bypass indicators suggests a setting that transitioned from bypass to accretion‐dominated.…”
Section: Architecture and Facies Distribution Of Unit Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will briefly describe the nature of the shelf portion of the topset of the clinoform units, with an emphasis on a slope channel identified just beyond the shelf edge on the slope. In outcrop, the shelf edge is often sharp but as a zone of interplaying fluvial, tidal, wave and gravity controls, and this zone is sometimes termed the ‘shelf‐slope transition’ (Dixon, ; Gomis‐Cartesio, Poyatos‐Moré, Hodgson, & Flint, ; Gomis‐Cartesio, Poyatos‐Moré, Hodgson, & Flint, ). Details of topset shelf deposits and the shelf‐slope transition is further described in De Almeida Jr. et al (), in review, where interaction of the shelf deltas with shelf‐edge incisions is documented along both depositional dip and strike sections.…”
Section: Outcrop Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%