2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shell finite element of reinforced concrete for internal pressure analysis of nuclear containment building

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RC panels, for instance, have to be modelled as multi-component structural systems: concrete, reinforcing bars and interaction between these two phases. This is the way used by many authors, namely Lee (2011), Marti et al (1998), Okamura and Kim (2000), Pimentel et al (2010), Selby and Vecchio (1997), Soltani et al (2005), Spacone and El-Tawil (2004) and Vecchio and Collins (1986). The main hypothesis of this first family of local refined analysis constitutive models consists in the superposition of stress distribution stemming from each phase and the interface stress; see for instance Feenstra and De Borst (1995); -for ''globalised'' RC models, the preferred approach consists in developing the constitutive model from an a priori general framework in order to formulate, in a consistent way, the state equations and the evolution laws and to define the intrinsic mechanical dissipation.…”
Section: Overall Context Of Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RC panels, for instance, have to be modelled as multi-component structural systems: concrete, reinforcing bars and interaction between these two phases. This is the way used by many authors, namely Lee (2011), Marti et al (1998), Okamura and Kim (2000), Pimentel et al (2010), Selby and Vecchio (1997), Soltani et al (2005), Spacone and El-Tawil (2004) and Vecchio and Collins (1986). The main hypothesis of this first family of local refined analysis constitutive models consists in the superposition of stress distribution stemming from each phase and the interface stress; see for instance Feenstra and De Borst (1995); -for ''globalised'' RC models, the preferred approach consists in developing the constitutive model from an a priori general framework in order to formulate, in a consistent way, the state equations and the evolution laws and to define the intrinsic mechanical dissipation.…”
Section: Overall Context Of Constitutive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the perfect bond and the displacement compatibility between concrete and steel material allow treating the steel as an integral part of the 3D finite element. The steel stiffness matrix is added to that of the concrete, and thus the total stiffness can be obtained as Equation 1:…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear containments are unique structures that are constantly exposed to harsh environmental conditions, including high temperature, high pressure, and nuclear radiation [1]. Under these conditions, the configurations of prestressed tendons and reinforced steel in the containment are complex, and the concrete damaged property and the ultimate capacity are generally difficult to evaluate [2e4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970's, many researchers have proposed an analytical model to predict the behavior of RC shell structures using the finite element method. The main approach used by most researchers is to develop a reinforced concrete shell element by combining a rational constitutive model of reinforced concrete material into finite element formulations of a general shell element with layer approaches (Hand, Pecknold [2]; Cervera, Hinton [3]; Scordelis and Chan [4]; Hu and Schnobrich [5]; Polak and Vecchio [6]; Kim, Lee [7]; Zhang, Bradford [8]; Lee [9]; Xiang, Mo [10]; Gopinath, Iyer [11], Matešan, Radnić [12], Hrynyk and Vecchio [13], and Lu, Xie [14]). The main problem faced by most researchers in the analysis of RC shell structures using the finite element method was that it often required expensive computational time due to the complicated material models and the difficulties encountered in the stability and accuracy of the solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%