1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.37.1229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shell model nuclear matrix elements for doubleβdecay

Abstract: The nuclear matrix elements for the Ge~' Se, ' Se~Kr, ' Se~' Kr, and ' Kr~' Sr double p decay were calculated in a shell-model space consisting of the Og9/2 1P,&2, lp3&2, and Ofsqz orbitals for both protons and neutrons, and using an effective interaction that contained secondorder corrections. For light intermediate neutrinos our results are in agreement with the previously available Los Alamos matrix elements. We have, however, obtained nuclear matrix elements relevant for intermediate heavy neutrinos, Higgs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the calculations in QRPA approach [6 -8] and in the weak coupling approximation [12]. Our result on Se OvP/3 decay is comparable with Ref.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with the calculations in QRPA approach [6 -8] and in the weak coupling approximation [12]. Our result on Se OvP/3 decay is comparable with Ref.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Usually, an assumption of weak coupling between the proton and neutron systems is used to truncate the huge model space to a practicable one [1,12]. Besides, the closure approximation has been assumed to be good in the Ov/3P decay, which is verified by Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the calculation of Refs. [1,15,16]. For s2Se OvPP decay, our result also is comparable with Refs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Further details on the parameters used are given, for example, in [6,8]. The alternative approach by Sinatkas and coworkers [20] has not been pursued in this…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%