1978
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(78)90004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shell structure in nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
76
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
15
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the previous results with the non-relativistic Skyrme-Hartree-Fock method [11]. On the other hand, for the Si isotopes, the deformation parameter for the 28,30,32 Si nuclei is drastically changed when a Λ particle is added, although the change for the other Si isotopes is small. That is, the 28,30,32 Si nuclei have oblate shape in the ground state.…”
Section: /3supporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the previous results with the non-relativistic Skyrme-Hartree-Fock method [11]. On the other hand, for the Si isotopes, the deformation parameter for the 28,30,32 Si nuclei is drastically changed when a Λ particle is added, although the change for the other Si isotopes is small. That is, the 28,30,32 Si nuclei have oblate shape in the ground state.…”
Section: /3supporting
confidence: 82%
“…We confirm that our conclusion remains the same for both the treatments of the pairing correlation, due to the fact that N or Z=14 is an oblate magic number [32]. We therefore conclude that the Λ particle significantly changes the deformation of 28 Si nucleus, at least for the two parameter sets of the RMF Lagrangian and irrespective of the treatment of pairing correlations.…”
Section: /3supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, different calculated Nilsson singleparticle level schemes indicate that such a gap may occur for N = 142 at β 2 values around 0.22 -0.23, in addition to the N = 152 gap occuring at higher values, with β 2 around 0.28 -0.29 [8,16]. In some cases, the subshell gap predicted at N = 142 in nuclei of mass ≈ 240 is explicitely indicated, in addition to that at N = 152 [17][18][19]. The occurence of such a shell gap should result from intricate structure details that dictate the relative positions of the deformed orbitals originating in the spherical shells 1i 11/2 , 1j 15/2 , and 2g 9/2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hexadecapole potential is defined to obtain a smooth variation [4] [5] [6] in the γ-plane so that the axial symmetry is not broken for 120 , 60 , 0 …”
Section: The Cnm Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%