2018
DOI: 10.1007/s41885-018-0030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shelter from the Storm? Household-Level Impacts of, and Responses to, the 2015 Floods in Malawi

Abstract: The Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. The papers carry the names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the International Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, effects are often complex, and the sometimes disasters affect the food basket composition, more than the total calories amount. For instance, McCarthy et al (2018) analyze the impacts of the floods that occurred during the 2014/15 growing season in Malawi, and find that while maize yields were lower for all households, drops in food consumption expenditures were less dramatic, and calories per capita were higher. But dietary diversity was significantly lower, suggesting that households adjust their consumption basket to maintain total intake at a lower cost (but at the expense of micronutrients).…”
Section: Consumption Patterns and Food Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, effects are often complex, and the sometimes disasters affect the food basket composition, more than the total calories amount. For instance, McCarthy et al (2018) analyze the impacts of the floods that occurred during the 2014/15 growing season in Malawi, and find that while maize yields were lower for all households, drops in food consumption expenditures were less dramatic, and calories per capita were higher. But dietary diversity was significantly lower, suggesting that households adjust their consumption basket to maintain total intake at a lower cost (but at the expense of micronutrients).…”
Section: Consumption Patterns and Food Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate measurements of crop production, cultivated area, and yield are at the heart of official agricultural statistics and are key to monitoring progress towards national and international development goals, including SDG 2. Further, the survey data underlying these outcomes are frequently used by agricultural economists to investigate a vast array of policy‐relevant research topics, including ( a ) the scale‐productivity relationship (Larson et al 2014; Julien et al 2019); ( b ) agricultural productivity impacts of fertilizer use (Harou et al 2017), soil quality (Berazneva et al 2018), land misallocation (Restuccia and Santaeulalia‐Llopis 2017), and sustainable land management practices (Arslan et al 2015); ( c ) farm‐ and household‐level impacts of exposure to extreme weather events (Wineman et al 2017; McCarthy et al 2018); ( d ) the extent and cost of gender differences in agricultural productivity (O'Sullivan et al 2014; Kilic et al ); ( e ) the relationships between agricultural and welfare outcomes at the household‐ and/or individual‐level (Carletto, Corral, and Guelfi 2017; Darko et al 2018); and ( f ) the comparative effects of agricultural versus non‐agricultural growth on poverty reduction (Dorosh and Thurlow 2018; Ivanic and Martin 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%