2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-1971(02)00130-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shelters for houseless youth: a follow‐up evaluation

Abstract: This study followed 345 Israeli youngsters who had been residents of two shelters for runaway and homeless youths, 6–12 weeks after their departure. Telephone interviews were conducted with the youngsters, their parents, and social workers in the community. A majority of the youngsters had either returned to their family homes, or had been placed out of home. Their residential stability was found to be low. Post‐shelter place of residence was related to length of stay at the shelter, amount of contact with the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors conclude that more appropriate services that consider the needs and desires of the children are needed. A similar conclusion was reached by Dekel et al (2003) in their evaluation of Israeli runaway shelters. The authors tracked 345 Israeli adolescents who resided in one of two runaway shelters at six to 12 weeks after their discharge from the shelter.…”
Section: International Researchsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors conclude that more appropriate services that consider the needs and desires of the children are needed. A similar conclusion was reached by Dekel et al (2003) in their evaluation of Israeli runaway shelters. The authors tracked 345 Israeli adolescents who resided in one of two runaway shelters at six to 12 weeks after their discharge from the shelter.…”
Section: International Researchsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several studies indicate that the number of street youth is increasing worldwide (Booth, 2006; Dekel, Peled, & Spiro, 2003; West, 2003). Toro (2007) notes that research on homelessness began to appear in the late 1990’s outside of the U.S. and that the majority of this research focuses on single homeless adults.…”
Section: International Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal reunification of street youth with their families (or whoever is found when they are taken there) without a risk assessment of the home environment has shown limited benefit and can be detrimental [35][37]. Whether youth leave home as a result of abusive conditions or as a result of poverty, our data suggest that the vast majority end up on the street because of seriously adverse home environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The primary focus of these programs is to de-escalate the crisis, establish communication between the youths and their families, attempt to stabilize the home environment, and reunify youths with their families whenever possible (Thompson, Maguin, & Pollio, 2003). The two main goals of shelters is providing a ''safe haven'' for houseless youth that is safe from the hazards of street living and assisting youth in finding a stable, normative residence that suits their needs (Dekel, Peled, & Spiro, 2003).…”
Section: Youth Shelters and Drop-in Centersmentioning
confidence: 99%