2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eeeic.2015.7165478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shielding effectiveness measurement and simulation of small perforated shielding enclosure using FEM

Abstract: This paper deals with an experimental measurement and a numerical simulation of shielding effectiveness of a perforated shielding enclosure using finite element method (FEM). There are shown possibilities of model definitions, differences between 2D and 3D models are discussed. Important part of simulation is the possibility to verify the model results -the simulation result should be verified in terms of total electric energy of the model on the degrees of freedom and the simulation results could be verified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, substituting (9) into (11), the total vector magnetic potential can be expressed as (see (15)) where…”
Section: Electric Fields In the Shielding Enclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, substituting (9) into (11), the total vector magnetic potential can be expressed as (see (15)) where…”
Section: Electric Fields In the Shielding Enclosurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time‐domain methods such as finite‐difference time‐domain method [10, 11 ] and transmission‐line matrix method [12, 13 ], have the advantage of high‐computational efficiency, which are suitable for wideband analysis. Frequency‐domain methods such as the method of moments (MoM) [14 ] and finite element method [15 ], possess higher accuracy in predicting the shielding performance of an apertured enclosure, which are suitable for narrowband analysis. Though the mentioned‐above numerical methods can readily model the complex enclosure structures and obtain accurate shielding effectiveness (SE) results, but take a lot of computing time and computational resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the time domain setting, the finite difference time domain method (FDTD) is prominent and has been considered, for example, in Georgakopoulos et al (2001) and Jiao et al (2006). For simulations in the frequency domain, the method of moments (MoM) (Araneo and Lovat, 2009), the finite element method (FEM) (Kubík and Skála, 2015; Carpes et al , 2000; Boubekeur et al , 2014) or transmission line models (TLM) (Carpes et al , 2000; Nie et al , 2011) are common. The cited works above mainly focus on shieldings with a single or few apertures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, highly integrated circuits and high‐operating frequencies have made the electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) a major issue . Among the EMC topics, shielding is a prominent one and there is an outstanding trend to study its different aspects nowadays . The inevitable need for the air ventilations, input/outputs, and other means of connections between either sides of the shields result in designing apertures and slots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency domain methods are suitable for steady‐state analysis and highly resonant structures . Method of moments and finite element method are the 2 most used methods for estimating SE. These numerical methods are accurate and appropriate for defining some shielding hints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%