Shift in performance of food safety management systems in supply chains: case of green bean chain in Kenya versus hot pepper chain in Uganda

Nanyunja, Jessica; Jacxsens, Liesbeth; Kirezieva, Klementina; Kaaya, Archileo N.; Uyttendaele, Mieke; Luning, Pieternel A.

doi:10.1002/jsfa.7518

Cited by 22 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Private standards, such as the BRC Standard, IFS‐Food, GLOBALG.A.P, SQF, and the Foundation for Food Safety Certification, (FSCC2000), have been widely adopted by the European food industry (Herzfeld, Drescher, & Grebitus, ; Schulze et al., ; Spadoni et al., ), and beyond at a global scale (Herzfeld et al., ). Particularly in emerging countries with poor institutions and legal frameworks (Henson & Humprey, ), private standards can support design and operation of FSMS and create access to global markets (for example, Kirezieva et al., , ; Kussaga, Luning, Tiisekwa, & Jacxsens, ; Nanyunja et al., ) or address the governance void for organizations seeking to extend their operation to those countries. The interplay between regulation and private food standards with regulation evolving from a “one size fits all” to risk‐based regulation is leading to a hybridization of food governance between public and private instruments (Verbruggen & Havinga, ), which impacts FSMS design and operation (Kirezieva & Luning, ).…”

Section: Compliance Approaches To Food Safety Using Food Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

Manning

Luning

Wallace

2019

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to review the development of food safety management systems (FSMS) from their origins in the 1950s to the present. The food safety challenges in modern food supply systems are explored and it is argued that there is a need for a more holistic thinking approach to food safety management. The narrative review highlights that while the transactional elements of how FSMS are developed, validated, implemented, monitored, and verified remains largely unchanged, how organizational culture frames the operation and efficacy of FSMS is becoming more important. The evolution of a wider academic and industry understanding of both the influence of food safety culture (FS‐culture) and also how such culture frames and enables, or conversely restricts the efficacy of the FSMS is crucial for consumer well‐being. Potential research gaps worthy of further study are identified as well as recommendations given for the application of the research findings within the food industry.

show abstract

Section: Compliance Approaches To Food Safety Using Food Supply Chainmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

Manning

Luning

Wallace

2019

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Moreover, a well-performed FSMS is supposed to deliver benefits for a firm beyond food safety objectives, namely, increasing sales revenue thanks to rising consumer confidence in the safety of the purchased food and obtaining a ticket for accessing the global food value chain (Mensah and Julien, 2011), reducing operating cost and lower insurance charges for avoided costs such as food safety incidents, recalls and complaints (Marucheck et al, 2011); satisfying the need of stakeholders/customer (Fotopoulos et al, 2011), enhancing a firm's reputation and promoting food safety guarantee or marketing tool to access more advanced markets (Nanyunja et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic literature review of food safety management system implementation in global supply chains

Nguyen

2021

BFJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe study sets to summarise managerial requirements, analyse practices and tools to measure food safety management system (FSMS) implementation. Also, underpinned by critical success factors (CSFs) theory, the authors explore when food firms manage FSMS and which factors are critical to their implementation to identify promising research directions for researchers and suggestions for practitioners through a comprehensive analytical lens.Design/methodology/approachIt is difficult to ensure food safety from farm to fork worldwide. The paper addresses this challenge from the angle of how firms measure and improve the implementation of the FSMS in global food supply chains by a systematic review combined with biological mapping analysis (VOS viewer) on 81 peer-reviewed papers published from 2005 to 2020.FindingsMandatory and voluntary regulations and standards are the most critical part of international requirements to assure integrated, proactive, risk-based approaches as well as continuous improvement in the FSMS in global food chains. To measure the FSMS, only a limited number of measurement tools for the FSMS have been identified. External and internal factors, and technology adoption that significantly impact the management of the FSMS implementation still require more future works.Research limitations/implicationsSeveral FSMS research gaps observed during the content analysis of selected papers within 15 years are presented along with ten future research questions.Practical implicationsA systematised list of published papers that have been studied and reported in this research could be a useful reference point for practitioners in the food industry.Originality/valueThis study set out to summarise managerial requirements for the FSMS from the existing research, analyse practices and tools to measure FSMS implementation, explore when food firms manage the FSMS, which factors are critical to their implementation, and identify promising research directions for researchers and useful suggestions for practitioners.

show abstract

“…The diagnostic tools provide a comprehensive checklist for the analysis of the FSMS environment (context factors), core control activities and core assurance activities. Recently, the performance of FSMS using diagnostic tools and MAS have been conducted in a lamb chain ( 14 ), food service establishments ( 17 , 18 ), hot pepper and green bean farms ( 19 ), fresh produce chain ( 20 ) and meat processing industries ( 15 ). Kohilavani et al ( 1 ) discussed the establishment of a HACCP system in selected powdered beverage manufacturers but focused mainly on the development of the system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the Performance of Food Safety Management System Using Food Safety Management System Diagnostic Tools and Microbial Assessment Scheme: A Case of Powdered Beverage Manufacturers

Cheah

Merican

Khaizura

et al. 2021

MJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The objective of the study is to assess the performance of the Food Safety Management System (FSMS) among powdered beverage manufacturers using Food Safety Management System Diagnostic Tools (FSMS-DI) and Microbial Assessment Scheme (MAS). Methods: FSMS-DI was used to evaluate the context factors, core control and core assurance activities of five powdered beverage manufacturers with different types of FSMS certification. Manufacturer A is not certified with any FSMS, while manufacturers B, C, D and E are complied with MeSTI, GMP, HACCP and ISO 22000, respectively. For MAS, samples were collected from the selected critical sampling locations of two manufacturers who complied FSMS with the least (manufacturer B) and the most stringent (manufacturer E) requirements. The samples consisted of two different types of powdered beverage products were analysed for total plate count (TPC), Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, yeast and mould count (YMC). Results: The food safety (FS) output of powdered beverages for manufacturer E was better (overall score of 3) than manufacturer B (overall score of 2–3). Manufacturer E was able to achieve their FS objectives. The FSMS activities of manufacturer C, D and E were better (overall score of 2–3) than manufacturer A and B (overall score of 1–2). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that FSMS-DI and MAS can be used to differentiate the FSMS performance of powdered beverage manufacturers with different types of FSMS certification. Higher scores of FSMS activities obtained by the manufacturer who complied with stringent FSMS certifications contributed to better microbiological safety performance of powdered beverages.

show abstract

Shift in performance of food safety management systems in supply chains: case of green bean chain in Kenya versus hot pepper chain in Uganda

Cited by 22 publications

References 64 publications

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

A systematic literature review of food safety management system implementation in global supply chains

Assessing the Performance of Food Safety Management System Using Food Safety Management System Diagnostic Tools and Microbial Assessment Scheme: A Case of Powdered Beverage Manufacturers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About