2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-012-0040-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shift invariant preduals of ℓ 1(ℤ)

Abstract: The Banach space 1 (Z) admits many non-isomorphic preduals, for example, C(K) for any compact countable space K, along with many more exotic Banach spaces. In this paper, we impose an extra condition: the predual must make the bilateral shift on 1 (Z) weak * -continuous. This is equivalent to making the natural convolution multiplication on 1 (Z) separately weak * -continuous and so turning 1 (Z) into a dual Banach algebra. We call such preduals shift-invariant. It is known that the only shift-invariant predua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However this does not give a counter-example to our conjecture. For further study of preduals of 1 (Z), see [23].…”
Section: The Topological Structure Of ωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this does not give a counter-example to our conjecture. For further study of preduals of 1 (Z), see [23].…”
Section: The Topological Structure Of ωmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lengthy paper of Dales and Lau [3] refers to Gulick's paper [5], but does not use the false theorem 4.6; private communication with my colleague Garth Dales reveals a history of previous suspicion about that result, but no actual counterexamples as presented here. The paper of Daws, Haydon, Schlumprecht and White [2] refers to (the proof of) Theorem 3.3 of [5], which we believe to be completely correct. Likewise the paper of Bouziad and Filali [1] quotes the proof, given by Gulick in [5] (Lemma 5.2), that the radical of L ∞ (G) * is nonseparable for any nondiscrete locally compact group G. This proof also is perfectly valid.…”
Section: āW * Is Semisimplementioning
confidence: 88%
“…For n ∈ N, let T n : H → H be the rank 1 operator with (2) T n e i = e i+1 , if i = 2n; 0, otherwise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The seemingly pedantic formulation of Definition 1.1 is necessary because the predual space A * need not be unique: in [DHSW12], the authors construct a continuum of different preduals of the convolution algebra ℓ 1 (Z), each of which is isometrically isomorphic to c 0 (Z), and each of which turns ℓ 1 (Z) into a dual Banach algebra.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%