2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting Armington trade preferences: A re-examination of the Mercosur–EU negotiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study that is perhaps closest to ours is Philippidis et al (2014) who also make use of gravity estimations. Differently from us, however, the main impact of the EU-Mercosur trade treaty on trade flows is derived through a more traditional approach that consists in directly embedding tariff changes into the general equilibrium model.…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Eu-mercosur Agreementmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study that is perhaps closest to ours is Philippidis et al (2014) who also make use of gravity estimations. Differently from us, however, the main impact of the EU-Mercosur trade treaty on trade flows is derived through a more traditional approach that consists in directly embedding tariff changes into the general equilibrium model.…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Eu-mercosur Agreementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…All other studies, having been performed before an actual agreement was reached, could only simulate the effect of a "potential" agreement. Some, as explained above, assumed the treaty would imply the complete elimination of all tariffs on goods trade (Diao et al, 2003;Boyer and Schuschny, 2010;Philippidis et al 2014) and on service trade (Kirkpatrick and George, 2009).…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Eu-mercosur Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All other studies, having been performed before an actual agreement was reached, could only simulate the effect of a "potential" agreement. Some, as explained above, assumed the treaty would imply the complete elimination of all tariffs on goods trade (Diao et al, 2003;Boyer and Schuschny, 2010;Philippidis et al 2014) and on service trade (Kirkpatrick and George, 2009). Others consider more complex scenarios than a full liberalization.…”
Section: Previous Studies On the Eu-mercosur Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shock feeds together with reductions of tariffs and subsidies into simulation experiments. See also Philippidis et al (2014) as well as Burfisher (2011). 33 More recently, the literature on structural gravity models has explored theoretically consistent ways to estimate trade effects of policy changes in counterfactual scenarios.…”
Section: Modelling Changes Along the Extensive Marginmentioning
confidence: 99%