2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting consumer behavior to address climate change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice to drive a fossil-fuel-powered car for any given trip is not solely a result of individual preferences. As noted by respondents, when it comes to transportation, a simple decision links to many facets of human decision-making, such as pragmatic considerations of cost, safety, time, and competing commitments, as well as psychological factors like social norms, values, negative affect, identity, culture, and equity (Habib et al 2021). Key informants strongly emphasized the importance of these human dimensions, yet noted how they are frequently missing lenses brought to bear on the mobility climate-action challenge for Vancouver.…”
Section: The Human Dimensions Of Climate Action In Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice to drive a fossil-fuel-powered car for any given trip is not solely a result of individual preferences. As noted by respondents, when it comes to transportation, a simple decision links to many facets of human decision-making, such as pragmatic considerations of cost, safety, time, and competing commitments, as well as psychological factors like social norms, values, negative affect, identity, culture, and equity (Habib et al 2021). Key informants strongly emphasized the importance of these human dimensions, yet noted how they are frequently missing lenses brought to bear on the mobility climate-action challenge for Vancouver.…”
Section: The Human Dimensions Of Climate Action In Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to bridge this attitude–behavior gap, White, Habib, & Hardisty (White et al, 2019, p. 23) developed a framework to promote sustainable behaviors and encourage more environmental sustainability research. Their SHIFT framework examines how to use S ocial influence, H abit, the I ndividual self, F eelings and cognition, and T angibility to promote environmentally conscious behaviors (Habib et al, 2021; White et al, 2019). Future research should explore specific strategies and promising practices for using the SHIFT framework to encourage sustainable food consumption and plant‐based diets.…”
Section: Seed Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long term, the implemented actions may also induce further changes in consumer behavior by triggering additional psychological mechanisms identified as important determinants of behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Schwarzer, 2008; Sniehotta et al, 2005), such as changes in social norms or self‐efficacy regarding sustainable and healthy consumption. For instance, if more people consume sustainable and healthy products, they may create an injunctive norm: through observing others making healthier and more sustainable food choices, individuals may be encouraged to engage in the same behaviors (Habib et al, 2021). Furthermore, implementing actions from the Farm to Fork strategy signals a descriptive norm, that is, that sustainable and healthy consumption is seen as a commendable behavior of citizens of the European Union.…”
Section: Evaluating the Farm To Fork Strategy From A Health Psycholog...mentioning
confidence: 99%