2017
DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1243531
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting cultivation, contentious land change and forest governance: the politics of swidden in East Kalimantan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After this period, the vegetation will be cleared and the farmers start new planting activity. The important step in shifting cultivation is burning of some wood biomass residue after fallow period to enhance soil fertility so more nutrition is available for crop plants (Thaler and Anandi 2017). In line with this finding, Fujiki et al (2017) reported that biomass burning caused flushing of minerals originating from the burnt plant materials.…”
Section: Wood Characteristics Of Plant Speciesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…After this period, the vegetation will be cleared and the farmers start new planting activity. The important step in shifting cultivation is burning of some wood biomass residue after fallow period to enhance soil fertility so more nutrition is available for crop plants (Thaler and Anandi 2017). In line with this finding, Fujiki et al (2017) reported that biomass burning caused flushing of minerals originating from the burnt plant materials.…”
Section: Wood Characteristics Of Plant Speciesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The question of what makes social forestry 'successful' is subject to the very definition of success used, which forests is looked at and who constitutes the 'social' in a social forestry scheme, as much as it is influenced by the motivation to conduct such an assessment in the first place. Over the past decades a number of scholars have raised this question in a context where traditional social forestry such as swidden had been illegalized, lacked tenure recognition and was described as causing major deforestation in the tropics (Dove, 1993;Li, 1999;Mertz et al, 2009;Mertz et al, 2005;Moeliono et al, 2017;Peluso et al, 1995;Pham et al, 2018;Thaler and Anandi, 2017). At the same time awareness had increased for the importance of communities in achieving environmental, economic and social sustainability, beyond being simply a target group for top-down planned interventions.…”
Section: Analytical Framework: Understanding Success and Measuring Somentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on field visits and interviews, it describes, in particular, how their knowledge and practices of burning align with the social and biophysical characteristics of swidden and livelihood needs. While these strategies reflect characteristics unique to Palawan, they also contain many elements that would be familiar to swidden farmers elsewhere in Southeast Asia, the Pacific islands, Africa, and Latin America (see Peters and Neuenschwander, 1988;Kull, 2004;Carmenta et al, 2013;Thaler et al, 2017;Thung, 2018). As the evidence shows, swidden farmers do not clear and burn as indiscriminately as state foresters, park rangers and NGOs might suggest.…”
Section: Swidden Persistence: Clearing and Burning Ethnoecologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%