2001
DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.1.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting ethics: debating the incentive question in organ transplantation

Abstract: The paper reviews the discussion within transplantation medicine about the organ supply and demand problem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower rates of deceased organ donation among certain ethnic/racial minority groups in the setting of greater need for some organs (particularly kidneys, for which immunologic factors affect compatibility of transplanted kidneys and transplant outcomes) have also heightened awareness of the need for efforts to understand mechanisms through which donation among different ethnic/racial groups can be improved (3)(4)(5). Public incentives (such as financial reimbursement, health care-related reimbursement or other recognition for living donors or deceased donors' families) to enhance persons' decisions to donate have been widely debated (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Concerns regarding the exploitation of persons with low income and regarding the appropriateness of applying a monetary value to human organs have spurred many groups to denounce monetary incentives for donation (9,12,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower rates of deceased organ donation among certain ethnic/racial minority groups in the setting of greater need for some organs (particularly kidneys, for which immunologic factors affect compatibility of transplanted kidneys and transplant outcomes) have also heightened awareness of the need for efforts to understand mechanisms through which donation among different ethnic/racial groups can be improved (3)(4)(5). Public incentives (such as financial reimbursement, health care-related reimbursement or other recognition for living donors or deceased donors' families) to enhance persons' decisions to donate have been widely debated (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Concerns regarding the exploitation of persons with low income and regarding the appropriateness of applying a monetary value to human organs have spurred many groups to denounce monetary incentives for donation (9,12,13).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landolt et al are right in their conclusion that there can be good reasons to educate the public and actively change attitudes. We should, however, be aware of the fact that surveys of public attitudes can easily be used politically to support the ethical preferences of the transplantation profession and "not just to assess, but to sway, public opinion" (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Web site administrators halted the process, the bidding had topped $5.7 million. The public reacted to the offer with condemnation and outrage (Harris and Alcorn 2001;Joralemon 2001). Recently, the clinical ethics committee of a Denver hospital recommended a "compassionate exception" to allow surgery to proceed when one of its transplant surgeons refused to perform a transplant procedure for a candidate whose donor had been solicited through a Web site matching donors and candidates.…”
Section: Compensatory Systems For Increasing Procurement Ratesmentioning
confidence: 97%