1992
DOI: 10.1159/000277253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting Levels of Analysis in the Investigation of Cognitive Aging

Abstract: Questions can be raised regarding the progress that has been achieved in accounting for the well-documented negative relations between chronological age during adulthood and fluid or process aspects of cognition. Advances in knowledge may have been limited in part because many researchers have ignored age-related influences that are common to a number of dependent variables. Two procedures are discussed that appear to have the potential to distinguish between general or common age-related influences and unique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the nature of any systemic effect that might exist is not obvious, except that it does not appear to be related to the effectiveness of memory control as assessed with the measures examined in this study. Nevertheless, an intriguing implication of this perspective is that, as has been suggested for at least 15 years (e.g., Salthouse, 1992), the null hypothesis in research on aging and cognition should no longer be that there are no age differences, but rather that there are no age differences beyond those shared with other cognitive abilities. The reasons for the relations among cognitive variables and abilities are still not well understood, but they are very well-established, as are the age-related influences on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the nature of any systemic effect that might exist is not obvious, except that it does not appear to be related to the effectiveness of memory control as assessed with the measures examined in this study. Nevertheless, an intriguing implication of this perspective is that, as has been suggested for at least 15 years (e.g., Salthouse, 1992), the null hypothesis in research on aging and cognition should no longer be that there are no age differences, but rather that there are no age differences beyond those shared with other cognitive abilities. The reasons for the relations among cognitive variables and abilities are still not well understood, but they are very well-established, as are the age-related influences on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of treating cognitive measures as if they exist in isolation, therefore, these findings imply that it may be reasonable, following a suggestion by Salthouse (1992), to reconceptualize the null hypothesis in research on aging and cognition from "no age differences" to "no age differences beyond those shared with other cognitive abilities." Interim summary.…”
Section: Investigating Unique Age Differencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…That is, given certain assumptions, the relations between the mean levels of performance in two age groups may allow a distinction between common and unique age-related effects (Salthouse, 1992b(Salthouse, , 1992d. The rationale has been described as follows:…”
Section: Analyses Of Systematic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon to be explained is thus the age-related variation in behavior, and not the behavior itself (Salthouse, 1991c(Salthouse, , 1992d. Ultimately, of course, more comprehensive theories should encompass all dimensions of cognitive phenomena, but an explanation of the relations between adult age and Type A or fluid aspects of cognition is by itself an extremely formidable goal at the present time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%