1996
DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240190903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting of gas chromatographic retention times due to solvent effects — a study using sulfur chemiluminescence detection

Abstract: SummaryGas chromatrography (GC) with sulfur chemiluminescence detection (SCD) is an outstanding combination for selectively determining trace concentrations of sulfur compounds in hydrocarbon samples. GC peaks can be identified by retention times when reproducible, automated injection techniques are used. However, as described in this work, analysts should be on the look out for retention shifting due to solvent effects from sample components. Three examples of retention shifting are presented: (1) thiophene b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the different matrixes in which the decane is dissolved. If we consider the other three analytes as a collective solvent, the retention times deviate in accordance with previously published results . The solvent-induced retention time shifting is more dramatic when the analyte peak elutes close to a one large solvent peak or a group of solvent peaks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is due to the different matrixes in which the decane is dissolved. If we consider the other three analytes as a collective solvent, the retention times deviate in accordance with previously published results . The solvent-induced retention time shifting is more dramatic when the analyte peak elutes close to a one large solvent peak or a group of solvent peaks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The retention times of the target phenols in wine were in a range of −4 and +24 s in comparison with the standards. The variation of the retention time of the analytes between standard solutions and real samples is commonly ascribed to matrix effects . Considering a measure to be consistent with the standard value when is within ±3SD of the standard retention time, phenol retention times in wine were not statistically consistent with those of the standards.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the difference in retention times seen between the aromatic analytes in jet fuel and those in heptane (see Figure ) is due primarily to the presence of the large band of components found below the aromatic analytes in the GC × GC chromatogram of jet fuel (see Figure A). This unresolved band of components traveled with the three aromatic analytes through the first GC column altering the column's chromatographic properties and changing retention times . Analysis by the standard addition method would eliminate this matrix effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first technique is the standard addition method. If standards for the analytes of interest are measured in a chemical matrix different from the sample, then analyte retention times and peak widths can differ significantly between a sample and standard . Standard addition overcomes this problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation