Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1996
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.1996.493187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting perspectives on organizational memory: from storage to active remembering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, the CSCW community and related areas have taken a keen interest in organizational memory (OM) [1], [3], [9]. This suggests that there is value in retaining and later drawing on historical records of virtual collaboration.…”
Section: Organizational Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the CSCW community and related areas have taken a keen interest in organizational memory (OM) [1], [3], [9]. This suggests that there is value in retaining and later drawing on historical records of virtual collaboration.…”
Section: Organizational Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the CSCW community and related areas have taken a keen interest in organisational memory (OM) [1,3,6]. This suggests that there is value in retaining and later drawing on historical records of virtual collaboration.…”
Section: Organisational Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the view being limited to the acquisition, retention and retrieval of information simplifies too much the model for organizational memory. Thus, authors such as Kuutti & Bannon (1996), claim that organizational memory should not be conceptualized as a single repository, but as a dynamic process that integrates reconstructions functions enabling the recall of past experiences. Corbett (2000) argues for a dynamic view of the structure of organizational memory, which should take into account the social nature of this memory.…”
Section: Information Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%