2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2013.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifting primes: Optimizing elliptic curve cryptography for 16-bit devices without hardware multiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ECC computations, we used TinyECC library [42] [43] which supports all operations, including point addition, point doubling and point multiplication, exponentiation operations for the TelsoB device. In our experiment settings, we used MD5 function for one-way hashing as the base hash functions.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ECC computations, we used TinyECC library [42] [43] which supports all operations, including point addition, point doubling and point multiplication, exponentiation operations for the TelsoB device. In our experiment settings, we used MD5 function for one-way hashing as the base hash functions.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCapBAC allows a distributed approach in which constrained devices are enabled with authorization logic by adapting the communication technologies and data-interchange format. Specifically, it makes use of JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) [42] as representation format for the token, the use of emerging communication protocols such as CoAP and 6LoWPAN, as well as a set of cryptographic optimizations for ECC [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the proposed scheme uses the tiny ECC [38] and has AES embedded in the WISP5 platform, its heaviness is apparent from the results. However, taking the algorithms used in the proposed protocol, the results reported by Marin et al [43] indicate that each point addition and point doubling on MSP430 require 22,981.05 and 25,743.13 CPU [45], using the same codes, the response times may decrease to half within maximum two years.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%