2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-020-03777-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts in coral clonality along a gradient of disturbance: insights on reproduction and dispersal of Pocillopora acuta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Pocillopora acuta in Kāneʻohe Bay release parthenogenetic larvae with moderate dispersal potential (comparatively lower than broadcast spawning larvae, but higher than fragmentation), achieving very high levels of clonality over the same spatial scale and in the same patch reef environments where we observed M. capitata (Gorospe & Karl, 2013). P. acuta in the Philippines can dominate reefs via asexual reproduction of ameiotic larvae, where clonality rates are highest with less wave energy (Torres, Forsman, & Ravago-Gotanco, 2020), but other studies have found no evidence of clonality regardless of habitat (Miller & Ayre, 2004). Another coral found in Kāneʻohe Bay, Lobactis scutaria (formerly Fungia scutaria) can form clones by budding and is often found in dense localized aggregations presumed to be largely derived from asexual reproduction (Lacks, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…For example, Pocillopora acuta in Kāneʻohe Bay release parthenogenetic larvae with moderate dispersal potential (comparatively lower than broadcast spawning larvae, but higher than fragmentation), achieving very high levels of clonality over the same spatial scale and in the same patch reef environments where we observed M. capitata (Gorospe & Karl, 2013). P. acuta in the Philippines can dominate reefs via asexual reproduction of ameiotic larvae, where clonality rates are highest with less wave energy (Torres, Forsman, & Ravago-Gotanco, 2020), but other studies have found no evidence of clonality regardless of habitat (Miller & Ayre, 2004). Another coral found in Kāneʻohe Bay, Lobactis scutaria (formerly Fungia scutaria) can form clones by budding and is often found in dense localized aggregations presumed to be largely derived from asexual reproduction (Lacks, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Another life-history characteristic common to many marine foundation species (e.g., corals, seagrasses, marsh grasses, some seaweeds) is a mixed reproductive system that includes both clonal and sexual reproduction. The degree of clonality observed in marine foundation species varies both geographically (e.g., Coyer et al, 2004;Baums et al, 2006;Torres et al, 2020) and across environmental gradients spanned by individual populations (e.g., Hughes and Lotterhos, 2014;Olesen et al, 2017;Hays et al, 2021). Both extrinsic and intrinsic factors contribute to realized mating system differences, such that difference in clonal structure within and across sites may reflect differential reproductive effort (genotypes that allocate more energy to sexual reproduction) or differential reproductive success (environments that favor the establishment of particular types of propagules).…”
Section: Life History and Mating Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a continuously changing environment, partially clonal populations may be less likely to keep pace and persist: when the optimum phenotype was constantly changing, generating novel allele combinations quickly became more important than replicating past winners (Orive et al, 2019). Thus, mixed reproductive systems may be advantageous in spatially heterogeneous environments (Williams, 1975;Eckert et al, 2016;Torres et al, 2020) like those common in coastal and marine systems, especially if allocation of energy to sex is flexible and fitness dependent Otto, 2007, 2009).…”
Section: Life History and Mating Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this question, we used the emerging model species Pocillopora acuta, a reef-building coral with well characterised ecology, reproduction and microbiome (Torda et al 2013a;Schmidt-Roach et al 2014a, b;Nakajima et al 2018;Damjanovic et al 2020b;Ros et al 2021). Previous studies have revealed that the microbiomes of Pocillopora species are generally stable under changing environmental conditions (Pogoreutz et al 2018;Epstein et al 2019), with species such as P. acuta often hosting site-specific microbiomes (Torres et al 2020), perhaps due to the brooding reproductive strategy of the host (Torda et al 2013a). In this study, we characterised the impacts of a range of bleaching severities on the P. acuta microbiome within two reefs of the Palm Island archipelago on the Central GBR, following the 2016 mass bleaching event.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%