2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shifts in forest composition in the eastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2 for the spatial patterns of the predictor variables). We also tested the effects of genus-level tree dominance changes in 10 most abundant tree genera ( 56 ) in the studied plots on the AM tree dominance change using the same mixed-effects model structure described above. The AM tree genera included Acer , Fraxinus , Prunus , Nyssa , and Ulmus , and the EM tree genera included Quercus , Pinus , Carya , Betula , and Populus .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2 for the spatial patterns of the predictor variables). We also tested the effects of genus-level tree dominance changes in 10 most abundant tree genera ( 56 ) in the studied plots on the AM tree dominance change using the same mixed-effects model structure described above. The AM tree genera included Acer , Fraxinus , Prunus , Nyssa , and Ulmus , and the EM tree genera included Quercus , Pinus , Carya , Betula , and Populus .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), and elms (Ulmus spp.) [1][2][3]. This shift may be caused by "mesophication" a hypothesized feedback loop by which systematic exclusion of the natural fire regime has allowed fire-sensitive, and often shade-tolerant, species (aka "mesophytes") to establish and create cooler, moister, and darker understory conditions that are unfavorable for oak regeneration and survival [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, more than half (12) focus on ecological prediction in a climate change context, three on biological invasions, and a single study each on the consequences of habitat degradation and exploitation. Five studies used traits to predict the outcomes of multiple global change drivers (two marine [Jacob et al 2011, Eklof et al 2015; three terrestrial [Cardillo et al 2004;Dury et al 2018;Knott et al 2019]).…”
Section: Traits-based Global Change Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%