2018 Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2018) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cpem.2018.8500847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shimming and Performance of the Permanent Magnet for NIM-2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (25), the reason why the operations of partial derivative and volume integral can be interchanged is that the magnetization energy change of the coil-suspension system is completely caused by the variations of B m and B c in the vertical direction. The experiment results in [21] showed that the relative change of B m within the ±50 mm vertical range is less than 2 × 10 −4 , so the magnitude of ∂B m /∂z is tiny in the air gap. Besides, the magnitude of B c is much smaller than that of B m .…”
Section: The Effect Of Energized Compensation Coil In the Weighing Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (25), the reason why the operations of partial derivative and volume integral can be interchanged is that the magnetization energy change of the coil-suspension system is completely caused by the variations of B m and B c in the vertical direction. The experiment results in [21] showed that the relative change of B m within the ±50 mm vertical range is less than 2 × 10 −4 , so the magnitude of ∂B m /∂z is tiny in the air gap. Besides, the magnitude of B c is much smaller than that of B m .…”
Section: The Effect Of Energized Compensation Coil In the Weighing Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…for I ′ , according to the magnetization principle introduced in section 2, it is related to B m . The experimental results in [21] showed that the magnitude of B m can be approximatively expressed as a quadratic function of z, e.g.…”
Section: The Introduced Deviation In the Moving Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in figure 11 and equation (43), the magnetic shunt returns part of the magnetic flux, which is then no longer available for the gap. The NIM-2 magnet system used both shimming and a magnetic shunt to remove the B r (z) slope [67]. Since it is difficult to demagnetize the shunt once it is saturated, we recommended to use high-saturation material for the shunt, such as HiperCo50 (saturation magnetic flux density is about 2.4 T).…”
Section: Flattening the Profilementioning
confidence: 99%