2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41423-018-0163-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shining light on the significance of NK cell CD56 brightness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that dNK cells contain lower level of PRF1 and GzmB than CD56 bright and CD56 dim peripheral NK cells (pNK). According to literature reports, it had demonstrated that dNK cells represent the limited cytotoxicity compared with peripheral blood NK cells, despite the fact that dNK cells express the perforin, granzyme A and granzyme B, and several NK‐activating receptors . CD56 bright CD16 − NK cells, predominant in decidual tissue, display poorly cytolytic activity and produced a variety of chemokines and cytokines, particularly IFN‐r and TNF‐α .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that dNK cells contain lower level of PRF1 and GzmB than CD56 bright and CD56 dim peripheral NK cells (pNK). According to literature reports, it had demonstrated that dNK cells represent the limited cytotoxicity compared with peripheral blood NK cells, despite the fact that dNK cells express the perforin, granzyme A and granzyme B, and several NK‐activating receptors . CD56 bright CD16 − NK cells, predominant in decidual tissue, display poorly cytolytic activity and produced a variety of chemokines and cytokines, particularly IFN‐r and TNF‐α .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also contrary to the conventional knowledge that mature and memory-like NKG2A − selfKIR + CD57 + NKG2C + NK cells generated by cytokine stimulation or CMV infection are more efficacious [93,94,95,96,97,98]. Although a unifying explanation for these seemingly contradictory findings is not yet available, recent observations suggest that the phenotype of NK cells determines the function, and CD56 bright or CD56 superbright NK cells may not only differentiate into mature cytotoxic NK cells, but also secrete enough cytokines to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [99]. Furthermore, those cytokines may induce the differentiation of cancer stem cells limiting their ability to expand and metastasize [100].…”
Section: Strategies To Enhance the Effect Of Nk Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, those cytokines may induce the differentiation of cancer stem cells limiting their ability to expand and metastasize [100]. Thus, the limitations of autologous NK cell therapy may be overcome by converting patient NK cells into a CD56 bright or CD56 superbright phenotype, rather than CD56 dim [62,99]. In addition, the conventional designation of maturity by the degree of CD56 fluorescence should be reconsidered.…”
Section: Strategies To Enhance the Effect Of Nk Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD56 has an unclear function itself and its “brightness” is not a good discriminator when it comes to implications of surface expression on NK cell functions. CD56 bright NK cells are considered to be non-cytotoxic and with immunoregulatory functions, but they can also exhibit enhanced cytotoxicity and degranulation against viral and tumor antigens (35). Along these lines, even absence of CD56 on NK cells marks a specific subset of CD56 neg NK cells resembling CD56 dim with moderate responsiveness and differential expression of several granule proteins (36, 37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%