2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ship design evaluation subject to carbon emission policymaking using a Markov decision process framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• The sum of all probabilities on the same raw P j P A ij is between 0 and 1, or 0 < P j P A ij < 1, in such case, P A ij is assigned a new value ðP A ij Þ n calculated which is its normalized value using the sum of all probabilities on the same raw, as shown in equation (15).…”
Section: Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• The sum of all probabilities on the same raw P j P A ij is between 0 and 1, or 0 < P j P A ij < 1, in such case, P A ij is assigned a new value ðP A ij Þ n calculated which is its normalized value using the sum of all probabilities on the same raw, as shown in equation (15).…”
Section: Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several attempts to implement RL represented in the Markov decision process (MDP) to support design efforts in several engineering disciplines, such as in ship design. 15–17 Markov decision process was also utilized to support design efforts in the AEC industry, such as the design of trusses, 18 building structural frames, 19 and windows. 20 However, RL remains underutilized in the AEC industry 21 and with a scope limited to one discipline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation begins with an ECA coverage of 1100 nm and a single fuel engine installed that burns MDO and HFO. Selecting the correct starting state is important because the resulting decision paths may be sensitive to these initial conditions (Kana et al, 2016a;Niese et al, 2015). Since this case study examines decisions regarding retrofitting an existing vessel, the starting state is designed to reflect the current design of the vessel as well as current regulatory environment.…”
Section: Starting Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SC-MDP model has been beneficial in analyzing decision making in the maritime domain due to its ability to handle time-varying uncertainty in both the endogenous and exogenous factors. The model has previously been used to examine decision making scenarios in the maritime domain involving ballast water treatment methods (Kana et al, 2016a;Niese & Singer, 2013), various design options to meet the Energy Efficiency Design Index (Niese et al, 2015), and studying personnel movement during emergency situations on board the vessel (Kana & Singer, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of the model include a state-based representation of the system attributes and uncertain external environment, the capability to model various decision scenarios, and the ability to model uncertain temporal changes. 13 Kana and Singer 5 introduced how to use this model to simulate the uncertain decisions individuals may make while searching for an exit during times of emergency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%