2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2011.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of identifying potential consequences and process outcomes due to abnormal events has been widely studied, usually using event tree analysis (API, 2008;Arunraj and Maiti, 2009;Hashemi et al, 2014a;Pariyani et al, 2012a;Rathnayaka et al, 2011). However, there has been less effort to consider the timedependent process deterioration in estimating the duration of loss scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of identifying potential consequences and process outcomes due to abnormal events has been widely studied, usually using event tree analysis (API, 2008;Arunraj and Maiti, 2009;Hashemi et al, 2014a;Pariyani et al, 2012a;Rathnayaka et al, 2011). However, there has been less effort to consider the timedependent process deterioration in estimating the duration of loss scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DyPASI methodology was utilised to mitigate the deficiencies of the current HAZID techniques in the identification of unexpected potential hazards related to atypical scenarios and the integration of the recommendations from past atypical accidents. Rathnayaka et al (2011aRathnayaka et al ( , 2011b developed the new safety assessment methodology system hazard identification, prediction and prevention (SHIPP) to provide a guide for possible improvements at every step of the accident sequence process. Hazards related to LNG properties and processing were identified and analysed to investigate possible accident scenarios, causes and their consequences.…”
Section: Overview Of the Hazard Identification Techniques For Lng Facmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the quantification includes uncertainties. However, the authors introduced a Bayesian updating mechanism to minimise the uncertainty in the quantitative analysis (Rathnayaka et al, 2011a(Rathnayaka et al, , 2011b.…”
Section: Overview Of the Hazard Identification Techniques For Lng Facmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used is based on SHIPP methodology developed by Rathnayaka et al [9]. SHIPP represents accidents as a propagation of material and/or energy releases through prevention and mitigation barriers that include process (operational, maintenance, and technical), human, as well as management and organizational barriers.…”
Section: Accident Modelling and Risk Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%