Advances in Structural Integrity 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7197-3_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHM—Prognostic Analysis of Tapered Attachment Lugs Under Fatigue Loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lug-hole boundary. Convergence study results are chosen from the earlier works depending on suitable number of degrees of freedom (Bharath et al, 2018). The far end of the attachment lugs is supported on rollers; further, the rigid body displacement/motion is suppressed in both the longitudinal and transverse direction (Figure 1).…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lug-hole boundary. Convergence study results are chosen from the earlier works depending on suitable number of degrees of freedom (Bharath et al, 2018). The far end of the attachment lugs is supported on rollers; further, the rigid body displacement/motion is suppressed in both the longitudinal and transverse direction (Figure 1).…”
Section: Boundary Conditions and Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a kind of important aircraft structural component, lug joints act as primary load-carrying members and are more susceptible to failure due to fatigue crack. 25 The article is organized as follows: In Section 2, the mathematical background of the heteroscedasticity treatment based on GP quantile regression is described. Section 3, which follows, introduces the fatigue experiment of attachment lugs and the method validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a kind of important aircraft structural component, lug joints act as primary load-carrying members and are more susceptible to failure due to fatigue crack. 25…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%