2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4940645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHM reliability and implementation – A personal military aviation perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to even larger uncertainty in the POD of SHM. Lindgren [47] discussed that, for military aviation, because of the validation constraints, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) remains at 4 or less (out of 10) and this becomes a significant barrier for implementing SHM on USAF aircraft.…”
Section: Certification Challenges To Implementing Shm On Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to even larger uncertainty in the POD of SHM. Lindgren [47] discussed that, for military aviation, because of the validation constraints, Technology Readiness Level (TRL) remains at 4 or less (out of 10) and this becomes a significant barrier for implementing SHM on USAF aircraft.…”
Section: Certification Challenges To Implementing Shm On Aircraftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary challenge stems from the integration of AE systems into composite structures. This has a long history (e.g., KC-135 military aircraft in the 1980ies [231]) and is still challenging today. Long-term SHM of FRP composite structures either with AE or guided waves may benefit from the integration of the complete monitoring system into the structure.…”
Section: Condition Monitoring (Cm) and Structural Health Monitoring (...mentioning
confidence: 99%