1972
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v13.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shoaling of Cnoidal Waves

Abstract: An equation is derived which governs the propagation of a cnoidal wave train over a gently sloping bottom. The equation is solved numerically, the solution being tabulated in terms of fH (Eq. 47) as a function of Ei = (Etr/pg) 1/3/gT2 and hi = h/gT2. Results are compared with sinusoidal wave theory. Two numerical examples are included.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to those obtained by Iwagaki and Sakai (1972). The wave shoaling curves given in Figure 7 are compared with the shoaling curves based on cnoidal wave theory developed by Svendsen and Kjaer (1972) and stream function theory by Dean (1974). The comparison shows similar trends, height of shoaling as a function of H 0 /L 0 .…”
Section: Figure 5 -Wave Shoaling Testsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These results are similar to those obtained by Iwagaki and Sakai (1972). The wave shoaling curves given in Figure 7 are compared with the shoaling curves based on cnoidal wave theory developed by Svendsen and Kjaer (1972) and stream function theory by Dean (1974). The comparison shows similar trends, height of shoaling as a function of H 0 /L 0 .…”
Section: Figure 5 -Wave Shoaling Testsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Prior to wave breaking, both η crest and H/h generally increase as waves propagating on the mild slope, while η trough decreases with the shoaling distance. This is typical in the wave shoaling process in which the wave phase speed and wavelength decrease, while the wave height increases to conserve the wave energy flux (Stiassnie & Peregrine, 1980;Svendsen & Brink-Kjaer, 1972). Moreover, the cases with lower wave steepness exhibit a larger wave shoaling coefficient (H b /H i with H b and H i being the wave height at the breaking point and at the constant depth, respectively), equal to 1.27, 1.63, and 1.81 for Cases 1-3, respectively.…”
Section: Free Surface Elevationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the earlier efforts in the study of finite-amplitude wave transformation treated shoaling of cnoidal waves. Svendsen and Brink-Kjaer (1973) connected first-order cnoidal theory with linear theory to develop a wave shoaling equation. They imposed the requirement of a matching energy flux to connect the two theories.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%