2013
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.3241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Absorption Capacity of Restorative Materials for Dental Implant Prostheses: An In Vitro Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
63
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noticing that the resistance to fracture progressively increased with occlusal thickness and the failure mode became more favorable; consequently, differently from the behavior of ceramic materials, thicker cores could enhance the clinical longevity of Cerasmart restorations thanks to the shock adsorbing capability of the high density nanoparticle-filled composite resin matrixx [17]. Furthermore, the clinical performances are strongly related both to the type of resin cement and to the accuracy of adhesive procedures [6,12,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noticing that the resistance to fracture progressively increased with occlusal thickness and the failure mode became more favorable; consequently, differently from the behavior of ceramic materials, thicker cores could enhance the clinical longevity of Cerasmart restorations thanks to the shock adsorbing capability of the high density nanoparticle-filled composite resin matrixx [17]. Furthermore, the clinical performances are strongly related both to the type of resin cement and to the accuracy of adhesive procedures [6,12,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fracture patterns were similar, significant differences between CAD-CAM composite and ceramic crowns were reported; indeed, resin-based restorations exhibited longer endurance limits before unrestorable fractures [16]. Furthermore, it was pointed out that CAD-CAM composite-based blocks have better shock absorbing properties than similar ceramic materials, although these results still remain partly controversial [17,18]. To date, very few studies are available about Cerasmart and its advantages and limitations should be investigated and better understood both in vitro and in vivo [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 This choice was made in the attempt to reduce the load on the implant. Even though the intensity, frequency and duration of the occlusal overload could not be measured, the implant was considered overloaded because the patient chew only with the left side of his mouth, as the elements 45, 46, 47 had been extracted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the amount of load to be defined as overload has not been quantified, also because the range of host physiological adaptability varies. 19 Up to now, clinical evidence on the impact of overloading on peri-implant bone is not available. The inability to quantitatively define overloading, as well as several methodological and ethical limitations, has seriously compromised the potential of human studies to draw valid conclusions.…”
Section: S Oralis S Sanguinis S Gordonii V Parvula F Nucleatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, veneering materials have been reported to absorb most of the energy, in contrast to the larger displacement and deformation of materials with a low Young's modulus (Ciftçi & Canay, 2001). Also, materials with a high Young's modulus were found to have less deformation under a load, with the stresses probably transferred through the material (Menini et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%