2016
DOI: 10.1090/surv/214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Formation in Small-Data Solutions to 3D Quasilinear Wave Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
170
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This remarkable structure was first 35 observed 36 by Klainerman and Rodnianski in their proof of low regularity well-posedness for quasilinear wave equations [36] and was also used in [15,52,60]. Combining, we find that L μtr g / χ − G L LX + μP = · · · .…”
Section: Energy Estimates At the Highest Ordersupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This remarkable structure was first 35 observed 36 by Klainerman and Rodnianski in their proof of low regularity well-posedness for quasilinear wave equations [36] and was also used in [15,52,60]. Combining, we find that L μtr g / χ − G L LX + μP = · · · .…”
Section: Energy Estimates At the Highest Ordersupporting
confidence: 66%
“…1.4.2, the energies (1.16a) and null fluxes (1.16b) control geometric torus derivatives with μ weights, which makes them too weak to control certain error integrals involving torus derivatives that lack μ weights, at least in regions where μ is small. The saving grace is that as in [15,52,60], our energy estimates generate a spacetime integral with a good sign. Under appropriate bootstrap assumptions, the integral is strong in regions where μ is small and controls geometric torus derivatives without μ weights.…”
Section: The Coercive Spacetime Integralmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations