1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.2929847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock Response of Several Plastic Bonded Explosives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was validated by comparing CTH simulations to one-dimensional gas-gun results provided by Sutherland [6] and those from relatively low curved shock fronts produced in this study with 50.8 mm wide donors of the same explosive in a modified wedge test. The CTH calculations did not match many of the experimental scenarios involving higher shock curvature produced by 12.7, 10.7, and 5.7 mm wide donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was validated by comparing CTH simulations to one-dimensional gas-gun results provided by Sutherland [6] and those from relatively low curved shock fronts produced in this study with 50.8 mm wide donors of the same explosive in a modified wedge test. The CTH calculations did not match many of the experimental scenarios involving higher shock curvature produced by 12.7, 10.7, and 5.7 mm wide donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded gauge results [6] from 1D tests on PBXN-110 were used to select the reactive flow model and hydrocode that was used to predict run distances for the MWT. The details of this selection are reported elsewhere [7].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ignition and growth (I&G) models were investigated and compared to embedded gauge results [4] from a 1D copper flyer impact test on PBXN-110. The flyer from this shot had an impact velocity of 999 m/s.…”
Section: Pbxn-110 Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%