1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.46245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock wave and detonation wave response of selected HMX based research explosives with HTPB binder systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These PBXN-111 reaction zone lengths supporting the detonation wave front for large diameter charges are greater than those found for smaller diameter explosives [13]. Zone lengths are also dependent on the size and quality of explosive ingredients [10,44,45].Note that the zone lengths increase for larger diameter cylinders, which suggests release waves from the radial surface are not interfering with some late time energy release supporting the detonation front. This point is supported by the D data for 47-48 mm cylinders that show D to be greater for the confined charge, where the confinement delays the radial release wave from reaching the center line.…”
Section: Calculated Pbxn-111 Detonation Sonic Zone Lengths As a Functmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These PBXN-111 reaction zone lengths supporting the detonation wave front for large diameter charges are greater than those found for smaller diameter explosives [13]. Zone lengths are also dependent on the size and quality of explosive ingredients [10,44,45].Note that the zone lengths increase for larger diameter cylinders, which suggests release waves from the radial surface are not interfering with some late time energy release supporting the detonation front. This point is supported by the D data for 47-48 mm cylinders that show D to be greater for the confined charge, where the confinement delays the radial release wave from reaching the center line.…”
Section: Calculated Pbxn-111 Detonation Sonic Zone Lengths As a Functmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Its unreacted EOS is [9] U,(mm/Ps) = 1.63 + 2.24uP. (1) Six HTPB explosives are listed in Table 1 with combinations of reactivity and thermal tmnsport on and off [10][11][12][13][14]. The results show best agreement with no reactivity of the binder as it affects the detonation velocity, and the spread of detonation velocities is large enough, i.e.…”
Section: Eng-48mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main driving forces in this area has been from the energetic materials community, as many explosives and propellants consist of explosive crystals in a polymer binder. Therefore there exists a wealth of literature on this particular subject [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Work on inert particulate-polymer matrix composites is driven from the explosives community in the investigation of inert simulants [11] or the need to understand their behaviour as they are often used as potting compounds [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%