2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock wave-induced permeabilization of mammalian cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 408 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is indicative of microbubble cavitation in vasculature, then the sustained mechanical activity in contact with the endothelial layer at higher PNP amplitudes could explain the more aggressive, often irreversible, bio-effects associated with subharmonic emissions (O'Reilly and Hynynen 2012; Jones et al 2018). Beyond physical contact, the role of bubble collapse shock waves for tissue disruption is a topic of ongoing research, with a thorough review recently available (Lopez-Marin et al 2018). The directivity of the 0.2-mm needle hydrophone used, and its close proximity to the capillary, mean the peakpositive pressure amplitudes of the shock wave measurements reported are sensitive to the precise bubble location, relative to the needle tip, including as a result of translation of the activity during the focused ultrasound exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is indicative of microbubble cavitation in vasculature, then the sustained mechanical activity in contact with the endothelial layer at higher PNP amplitudes could explain the more aggressive, often irreversible, bio-effects associated with subharmonic emissions (O'Reilly and Hynynen 2012; Jones et al 2018). Beyond physical contact, the role of bubble collapse shock waves for tissue disruption is a topic of ongoing research, with a thorough review recently available (Lopez-Marin et al 2018). The directivity of the 0.2-mm needle hydrophone used, and its close proximity to the capillary, mean the peakpositive pressure amplitudes of the shock wave measurements reported are sensitive to the precise bubble location, relative to the needle tip, including as a result of translation of the activity during the focused ultrasound exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foglietta et al reported that when mesenchymal stem cells and cancer cells (glioblastoma or osteosarcoma) co-cultures are irradiated with SW, the consequence is a selective cancer cell death related to the ROS production by mesenchymal stem cells [ 163 ]. Otherwise, SW could be employed to permeabilize temporarily cell membrane and improve the uptake of drugs and chemotherapies [ 164 , 165 ], as well for the delivery of nucleic acids [ 166 , 167 ].…”
Section: Mechanical Wave-based Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this work, previous studies only looked at ultrasonic sonoporation caused by cavitation [5]. Of note, rESWT has no heating effects [23], making a desirable feature for clinical use. These features together endow rESWT a safer and more convenient clinical therapy than ultrasound from the perspective of combinatory nanomedicine in cancer treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Under this setting, rESWT-induced endothelial leakiness should supposedly favor the delivery and extravasation of nano-drugs into the tumor microenvironment and thereby reinforce tumor targeting and the following treatment. In fact, recent burgeoning evidence indicates that extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) is applicable to treat tumors, due to increased plasma membrane permeability and intracellular drug concentration that are ascribed to ESW-driven cavitation [21][22][23]. Thus, it would be of proven importance to extend ESW applications in cancer therapeutics, although a wider caliber of combinatory therapies and deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms are warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%