2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1563035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock wave induced vaporization of porous solids

Abstract: Strong shock waves generated by hypervelocity impact can induce vaporization in solid materials. To pursue knowledge of the chemical species in the shock-induced vapors, one needs to design experiments that will drive the system to such thermodynamic states that sufficient vapor can be generated for investigation. It is common to use porous media to reach high entropy, vaporized states in impact experiments. We extended calculations by Ahrens ͓J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2443 ͑1972͔͒ and Ahrens and O'Keefe ͓The Moon 4,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For all except stainless steel, which is based on a single shot (see text), the crater diameter/projectile diameter (y-axis) figures are averages and one standard deviation error bars from the data plotted as linear trends in Fig. 1. temperatures and, consequently, a greater loss of volatile components when compared to less porous particles of the same material (Shen et al 2003). To make a reliable interpretation of a Stardust residue by direct comparison with a laboratory impact, it is therefore necessary to ensure that both impacting particles had similar internal porosity, which may be inferred by measuring their density from the depth/ internal diameter ratio of their craters.…”
Section: Crater Morphology and Depth As A Function Of Impactor Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all except stainless steel, which is based on a single shot (see text), the crater diameter/projectile diameter (y-axis) figures are averages and one standard deviation error bars from the data plotted as linear trends in Fig. 1. temperatures and, consequently, a greater loss of volatile components when compared to less porous particles of the same material (Shen et al 2003). To make a reliable interpretation of a Stardust residue by direct comparison with a laboratory impact, it is therefore necessary to ensure that both impacting particles had similar internal porosity, which may be inferred by measuring their density from the depth/ internal diameter ratio of their craters.…”
Section: Crater Morphology and Depth As A Function Of Impactor Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Неслучайно идентификация таких моделей часто выполняется на вязких пластичных материалах, таких как алюминий, медь [6,[40][41][42][43]. Наилучшие результаты применения гидродинамической аналогии достигаются при решении задач динамики грунтов [44].…”
Section: основные подходы при моделировании процессов динамического пunclassified
“…I 2 (Takemura et al, 1982(Takemura et al, , 2003, Br 2 (Fujihisa et al, 1995), O 2 (Shimizu et al, 1998), HCl, HBr, H 2 O (Ono et al, 2005), H 2 S (Benedict, 1995), HI (Ji et al, 2009), CO 2 (Lazicki et al, 2010), BI 3 (Hamaya et al, 2010), as well as some crystalline solids, viz. sillimanite Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (Schneider & Hornemann, 1981), borates, silicates, germinates, sulfates (Arora, 2000), Mg(OH) 2 , CaCO 3 , CaSO 4 (Shen et al, 2003), ZrWO 4 (Arora et al, 2004), Sc 2 (MoO 4 ) 3 (Arora et al, 2005), SnO (Giefers et al, 2005) and mullite Al 6 Si 2 O 13 (Kawai et al, 2009).…”
Section: Experimental Background 21 Pressure Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%