1967
DOI: 10.2514/3.28969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shock-wave shapes around spherical-and cylindrical-nosed bodies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
97
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation can be at least partially explained by the growing lateral displacement of the primary bow shock with decreasing Mach number: for a larger shock radius, the secondary sphere will effectively lie further inside the shock at the same initial position, hence a larger radius ratio will be required to achieve the same degree of repulsion. Therefore, in an attempt to scale out the effect of the primary bow-shock location, in figure 16(b) we present the same velocity data, but with the abscissa now the scaled distance (r 1 + 2r 2 )/R s , where R s is the radial location of the primary bow shock (at the initial axial location of the sphere centres) as given by the correlation of Billig (1967). This modified abscissa is thus the initial lateral location of the outer secondary-sphere edge, normalized by the bow-shock displacement.…”
Section: Effect Of Mach Number It Is Clear From Comparing the Results Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation can be at least partially explained by the growing lateral displacement of the primary bow shock with decreasing Mach number: for a larger shock radius, the secondary sphere will effectively lie further inside the shock at the same initial position, hence a larger radius ratio will be required to achieve the same degree of repulsion. Therefore, in an attempt to scale out the effect of the primary bow-shock location, in figure 16(b) we present the same velocity data, but with the abscissa now the scaled distance (r 1 + 2r 2 )/R s , where R s is the radial location of the primary bow shock (at the initial axial location of the sphere centres) as given by the correlation of Billig (1967). This modified abscissa is thus the initial lateral location of the outer secondary-sphere edge, normalized by the bow-shock displacement.…”
Section: Effect Of Mach Number It Is Clear From Comparing the Results Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical solutions obtained for M 1 = 2 are represented on figure 9. From theoretical and experimental results, Billig proposed in [4] to model the geometrical form of the shock wave by a hyperbola. Then, the distance ∆ of the shock from the obstacle, measured on the stagnation line (y = 1), is approximated in [4] by:…”
Section: Steady-state Supersonic Flow Around a Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In space applications, it has been found to be largely consistent with the fast magnetosonic Mach number, M f , when fitted with observations of distant shock crossings of Venus, Earth and Mars [Slavin et al, shown to become better in agreement with gas dynamic theory. This is attributed to the decrease in the IMF strength since wave takes a size and shape similar to the obstacle [Billig, 1967]. Saturn's magnetosphere is a blunt body (as opposed to a pointed wedge) and a detached bow shock is thus formed in the dayside region [Slavin et al, 1985].…”
Section: Size and Shapementioning
confidence: 99%