2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2018.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shooting methods for state-dependent impulsive boundary value problems, with applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x(t) ∈ int K, ẋ(s+) = ẋ(s) + I(x(s), ẋ(s)), if x(s) ∈ ∂K, (2) where K ⊂ R n is some bounded subset which will be specified later, and I : K × R n → R n is an impulse map describing the impact law.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x(t) ∈ int K, ẋ(s+) = ẋ(s) + I(x(s), ẋ(s)), if x(s) ∈ ∂K, (2) where K ⊂ R n is some bounded subset which will be specified later, and I : K × R n → R n is an impulse map describing the impact law.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods for boundary value problems are mainly divided into two categories: direct methods and shooting methods [1]. The shooting strategies are important for using IVP algorithms to solve BVPs, but the computational mechanisms involve additional costs to find out high order initial conditions [2][3][4]. A wellknown direct method for BVPs is the finite difference method widely used in the literature [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this paper, two papers dealing with one-dimensional case were written. In [2] the authors gave the numerical treatment to the problem. In [9] the author transformed a one dimensional billiard problem to the problem without impulses and proved multiplicity results by the use of the Schauder Fixed Point Theorem.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%