2017
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201700838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shooting over the Streamer Spread - A Novel Approach in Seismic Marine Acquisition and Imaging

Abstract: In this paper we present a new marine seismic acquisition technique initially developed to meet the imaging challenges of the Loppa High in the Norwegian Barents Sea. Two seismic vessels operate in tandem; one streamer vessel towing a spread of deep, densely spaced streamers, and one source vessel towing two or more sources. The source vessel is positioned on top of the seismic spread. The unique configuration facilitates acquisition of zero-offset data. This, together with the fact that both negative and posi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data component in Figure 1a represents the desired signal in a noisy shot gather. As we can see, the simulated desired signal has events with hyperbolic curvatures as if it were acquired from a source-over-streamer (Vinje et al, 2017) acquisition. The data component in Figure 1b represents a type of hyperbolic coherent noise, which can be regarded as blending noise from a blended acquisition using a short shot point interval or SI noise coming from the side.…”
Section: Training Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The data component in Figure 1a represents the desired signal in a noisy shot gather. As we can see, the simulated desired signal has events with hyperbolic curvatures as if it were acquired from a source-over-streamer (Vinje et al, 2017) acquisition. The data component in Figure 1b represents a type of hyperbolic coherent noise, which can be regarded as blending noise from a blended acquisition using a short shot point interval or SI noise coming from the side.…”
Section: Training Datamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The bin centre locations of each of the 3D constant OFCs ranged from 37.5 m to 712.5 m with an increment of 75 m. The size of each OFC was approximately 4 × 13 km with 750‐time samples using a 2 ms temporal sampling. We then modelled a new sparsely sampled data set dr,h,${{{\bf d}}_{r,h}},$ in which we had the source‐over‐streamer (Vinje et al ., 2017) survey layout shown in Figure 2(a). This layout gave sparsely populated near OFCs with varying offset and azimuth.…”
Section: Synthetic and Real Data Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This survey was acquired with an unconventional marine split-spread geometry denoted as TopSeis. For a description of the TopSeis acquisition geometry in general and the dataset employed in this work specifically, the reader is referred to Vinje et al (2017) and Thorkildsen (2019) respectively.…”
Section: Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%