2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shooting two hawks with one arrow: Could China's emission trading scheme promote green development efficiency and regional carbon equality?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the emergence of carbon emission trading policy, the research on the effectiveness of the carbon emission trading policy has been constantly emerging. Among them, as for the contribution of the carbon emission trading policy to environmental governance, most scholars found that whether the developed countries represented by the EU countries (Nordhaus, 2007;Stern, 2007) or the developing countries represented by China (Xiu et al, 2015;Gao et al, 2020;Xuan et al, 2020), the carbon emission trading policy effectively reduces carbon dioxide emissions, improves carbon emission allocation and efficiency (Chang, 2012) and regional carbon equalization (Zhang et al, 2021), and contributes to the realization of "carbon peak" in advance (Wu and Zhu, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the emergence of carbon emission trading policy, the research on the effectiveness of the carbon emission trading policy has been constantly emerging. Among them, as for the contribution of the carbon emission trading policy to environmental governance, most scholars found that whether the developed countries represented by the EU countries (Nordhaus, 2007;Stern, 2007) or the developing countries represented by China (Xiu et al, 2015;Gao et al, 2020;Xuan et al, 2020), the carbon emission trading policy effectively reduces carbon dioxide emissions, improves carbon emission allocation and efficiency (Chang, 2012) and regional carbon equalization (Zhang et al, 2021), and contributes to the realization of "carbon peak" in advance (Wu and Zhu, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical analysis supports Porter's hypothesis that technological innovation has an intermediary effect on the impact of emissions trading on the upgrading of industrial structure. Zhang S. et al (2021) verified the positive effects of China's ETS and found that China's ETS significantly improved the efficiency of green development and regional carbon equality. Mechanism analysis further shows that China's ETS promotes regional carbon equality by increasing green total factor productivity and reducing investment in carbon-intensive industries in pilot provinces, confirming the Porter hypothesis and the effect of investment transfer.…”
Section: Research On Policy Effects Of Emission Trading Schemementioning
confidence: 82%
“…A similar study using propensity score matching-DID found that the newly revised Environmental Protection Law promotes the profitability of listed companies [41]. DID was also used to assess the effect of China's carbon emissions trading system on green development efficiency and regional carbon equality, the results of which also supported the Porter hypothesis [43]. However, further evidence suggested that the Porter hypothesis was not validated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%